Eco predictions/thoughts (1 Viewer)

[octavia2103]

My class did Indonesia but at the last minute, I swapped for China because my teacher was so awful at teaching economics. Just kept on playing atomi videos and you had to virtually self teach the content

ah that sucks, i had a bad eco teacher in yr11 but i think he got fired so we got a better eco teacher

 

[octavia2103]

Am I cooked if I got 83 raw and everyone else thought it was super easy? SUPER easy - no subsidy questions, no complicated multiplier questions, no ‘deep’ questions

nah you're not cooked 83 is quite good
idk if the exam was super easy imo yes there wasn't any types of those questions but i think the paper was challenging in some aspects
i found the mcqs to be harder this year honestly

 

[K2Trappy]

Am I cooked if I got 83 raw and everyone else thought it was super easy? SUPER easy - no subsidy questions, no complicated multiplier questions, no ‘deep’ questions

if ur talking about MC subsidy and multiplier questions are soo common that its not hard, but MC wasn't too bad this yr
ur not cooked 83 would prob align to close to 90 maybe just under

 

[pilot_djeddie]

ah that sucks, i had a bad eco teacher in yr11 but i think he got fired so we got a better eco teacher

I'm so happy for you. In honesty, it's because of my year 12 experience that I want to be an economics tutor to help other students not suffer the same fate as me. Economics should be far more than just drowniness

 

[octavia2103]

I'm so happy for you. In honesty, it's because of my year 12 experience that I want to be an economics tutor to help other students not suffer the same fate as me. Economics should be far more than just drowniness

ahh that sounds really nice i'm sure you'd be a great tutor!

 

[pilot_djeddie]

ahh that sounds really nice i'm sure you'd be a great tutor!

Like things I would encourage students to add in that are not in the syllabus:

1.) Kuznet's structural transformation theory
2.) Paradox of plenty
3.) Greater fool theory
4.) Keynesian vs monetarism (Keynes encouraged economic growth through a shift in AD whilst Friedman and Hayek encouraged more supply side economics)

 

[danieljames]

Is question 19 A or D?

I had D.

And is 13 C surely??

 

[tvskAXatar]

Is question 19 A or D?

I had D.

And is 13 C surely??

13 is C, in dangerman’s original solutions

 

[zackbekro123]

Is Aus-ASEAN multilateral?

 

[tvskAXatar]

Is Aus-ASEAN multilateral?

Think you needed ASEAN-Australia-NZ for it to be multilateral. Aus-ASEAN is technically bilateral like the proposed Aus-EU arrangement

 

[tvskAXatar]

For the fucking electric chargers question:



What I wrote for private benefit was increased profit revenue for the manufacturers and operators of this electric vehicle charging station which are likely to be businesses/corporations in sustainable industries. For social benefit I explained the possibility of decreased overall pollution from petrol and diesel (increased air quality) in streets in this local area as people are more incentivised to buy electric cars to replace petrol/diesel as a new favourable/optimal charging location has been established.

Did I get the full 3 marks?

 

[hi tememan]

what you think bout question 19
when global inflation decrease-the export volume increase as more competitive-supply of aud increase and export decreases as import increases so A
but the answer say d but when export demand decreases, the income also decrease and decrease import, so a TOT have a not much effect

 

[ojjjjjjjkkllkkk]

For the fucking electric chargers question:

View attachment 45654

What I wrote for private benefit was increased profit revenue for the manufacturers and operators of this electric vehicle charging station which are likely to be businesses/corporations in sustainable industries. For social benefit I explained the possibility of decreased overall pollution from petrol and diesel (increased air quality) in streets in this local area as people are more incentivised to buy electric cars to replace petrol/diesel as a new favourable/optimal charging location has been established.

Did I get the full 3 marks?

I reckon its likely 3 marks. You could also mention that the private benefit is increased employment as well but yeh probably 3.

 

[tvskAXatar]

Am I cooked if I got 82-85 raw?

 

[ojjjjjjjkkllkkk]

well the cutoff will be 85 raw which isn't as easy to get. Require splits of 17,34,17,17

 

[tvskAXatar]

well the cutoff will be 85 raw which isn't as easy to get. Require splits of 17,34,17,17

Well based of the solutions I got 18/20 on MC, very confident on 37/40 on SA, as long as I don't face annihilation in the essay section I should scrape through to get 85. Is 85 usually the cutoff?

 

[ojjjjjjjkkllkkk]

Getting 37/40 should secure a band 6 but don't overanalyse it as short answers require specificity and conciseness and who knows how they mark it. But honestly your splits can look at 18, 35, 16, 16- just going at worst - thats 85 which is band 6. So you should but essay questions especiallly the first one required a lot of stats and information. Me personally i know i got 18 in multies just can't remmeber only one of my solutions so likely split is 18, 35, 18, 16 which is 87. If you think you smashed short answer which would singifncantly boost your mark you are looking at a range of 87-92 if you did well in essays as well.

 

[ojjjjjjjkkllkkk]

For the fucking electric chargers question:

View attachment 45654

What I wrote for private benefit was increased profit revenue for the manufacturers and operators of this electric vehicle charging station which are likely to be businesses/corporations in sustainable industries. For social benefit I explained the possibility of decreased overall pollution from petrol and diesel (increased air quality) in streets in this local area as people are more incentivised to buy electric cars to replace petrol/diesel as a new favourable/optimal charging location has been established.

Did I get the full 3 marks?

i said private benefit was increased employment - do you reckon that wiould still work even though profit is obiosulyt the most obvious one?

 

[Zimmins-R-Ponnins]

For that question, I wrote that the private benefit was for individuals with electric cars having to pay less for fuel - I'm rethinking that now and that's not what they were looking for was it