Paper 2 is not up yet but when it goes up it will be at the same link because it is part of the same exam pack.
damn now i know 200% i screwed up the apricots question instead of 100%
I'll look at them more extensively later since I only skimmed through it - but nesa sample answers are really lacking lol they have the bare minimum
update: yeah just read through all of them thoroughly they kinda suck
they say sample answer but I've always felt the sample answers were the bare minimum (band 4-5 standards)
nesa standards of an average-mark-range i *think*. cos idt it's a sample answer indicative of a full marker, they said it was a sample response not an exemplar one as the above comment said
I was under the impression that it was minimum needed for a top range response (A-range or b6)
yeah my science teacher said that sample responses are the minimum to get full marks in a question (e.g 7/7) but it could work differently for other subjects
ok that's good then, cos i knew that the hsc markers were super lenient but i wasn't aware of how lenient they were, hoping for a top mark for section i then
nah i doubt it, if you look at the marking guidelines of the past eng adv hscs you'll see the sample answers for section i of paper 1 are all crappy as well but the alignment is roughly the same (not 1:1). if anything, then alignment could slightly be worse than 2020-22 due to the fact we had no excerpt questions and the essay qs were all pretty broad, but that could easily be compensated with by scrutinising the essays (eg. if they answered every single aspect of the q, how sophisticated the idea was, etc), but iirc 2019 didn't have any excerpts either and the alignment seems more or less the same with 2020-22 ...