English Advanced Predictions/Thoughts (6 Viewers)

[aqwerty13402]

oh so i was 0/5 this year

 

[barnyard]

oh so i was 0/5 this year

you got "no images" in shorts right!

 

[harxs]

you got "no images" in shorts right!

1/5 tho basically yes we got no images shorts was so hard bru

 

[kittyc4tkittycar]

oh so i was 0/5 this year

its ok we still love you aqwerty13402 (at least i do)

 

[tywebb]

paper 2 is up: https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/noindex/2025-10/2025-hsc-english-advanced-paper-2.pdf

 

[aqwerty13402]

paper 2 is up: https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/noindex/2025-10/2025-hsc-english-advanced-paper-2.pdf

Module A would've fucked me over
Module B was amazing
Module C was ok

 

[la_sportive]

Module A would've fucked me over
Module B was amazing
Module C was ok

oh it's you
nah my mod a q looks fire and mod b is easy asf (eliot lol)
mod c would have killed me coz i hate imaginative

overall i'm happy w last year's hsc compared to this year tbh coz mod a and b were so basic but maybe bc this year was more specific comparitively i would have done better

tbh i'm just glad we aren't sitting these exams...

 

[lolcti]

LOLLL I just read the marking guidelines for paper 1 I’m fucked

 

[tywebb]

Inside the shed where HSC marks are being decided

Hard at work marking HSC papers in a shed at Sydney Olympic Park, teachers reveal what is being rewarded – and what is not.

www.smh.com.au

 

[tywebb]

article just came on smh website. dunno if u can open. if not u can use https://archive.is/ to open

 

[coolcat6778]

Why haven't the marking guidelines released for MX2 and MX1? what the hell are they doing?

They released shitty chemisery marking guidelines despite chemisery being later?

 

[RedDragonStar1]

Why haven't the marking guidelines released for MX2 and MX1? what the hell are they doing?

They released shitty chemisery marking guidelines despite chemisery being later?

MX2 was bad and probably they treading very carefully on what to give marks to and what not to.

 

[tywebb]

MX2 was bad and probably they treading very carefully on what to give marks to and what not to.

i disagree. your perception of bad might be different to mine.

for me bad is boring, so boring when one wants to do past papers one might say skip those papers.

so i think in recent years the extension 2 papers have been getting better - so not bad.

they have interesting questions, not typical textbook questions, and not typical questions coming from tutoring companies.

 

[RedDragonStar1]

i disagree. your perception of bad might be different to mine.

for me bad is boring, so boring when one wants to do past papers one might say skip those papers.

so i think in recent years the extension 2 papers have been getting better - so not bad.

they have interesting questions, not typical textbook questions, and not typical questions coming from tutoring companies.

My idea of bad kinda stems from the fact that decent chunk of the questions were too quirky for too early in the paper (like 13a) and I don't feel like doing past papers helped me do any better than my trials.

This might be a really hot take tho, and I'm willing to accept that I am kinda average at mx2 tbh, but that's just how it felt to me.

 

[coolcat6778]

My idea of bad kinda stems from the fact that decent chunk of the questions were too quirky for too early in the paper (like 13a) and I don't feel like doing past papers helped me do any better than my trials.

This might be a really hot take tho, and I'm willing to accept that I am kinda average at mx2 tbh, but that's just how it felt to me.

i wish i was average, average in mx2 is 85 hsc mark which scales barely any different compared to a 90