moll.
Learn to science.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 3,545
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2008
Bio and Legal i see...black_kat_meow said:Ahhh, soz, I thought it said "was A little different".
6 hours of exams have fried my brain...
How'd you go?
Bio and Legal i see...black_kat_meow said:Ahhh, soz, I thought it said "was A little different".
6 hours of exams have fried my brain...
Alright, I guess. I think I got lucky with the questions... Don't know how well I worded my answers though... Ah well, can forget about Legal now, yay!moll. said:Bio and Legal i see...
How'd you go?
several US states did give mentally ill people vasectomies a few decades ago.midifile said:I say give the idiots [guys] vasectomies
A good place to start would be with the gaols. They're all banned from having kids.squeenie said:I'm still not sure....
Eugenics and intellectual discrimination sound great in theory, but its just not... right, if thats how one can put it. Sure, it would be great if we could get all the 'dumb' people out of the way, but who are we to decide who is better than the other?
And then we'd need to draw the line between who is 'intelligent' and who isn't. What types of intelligence would we need to look at? What means would we have of measuring them? Would these means be accurate enough?
I wonder if there ever will be a straight answer to any of these questions...
Ummm...moll. said:My vote: charge people to have kids. That way, only the rich could afford it, and generally the rich are smart.
You make a valid point.metalheaven said:Ummm...
I rest my case...
Pretty sure our justice system works by charging the bad.lolokay said:imo, don't charge people for having kids.
maybe take away the baby bonus or something, except for people who actually are contributing to society and would need the financial help
policies that reward the good rather than charging the bad are probably more likely to work
No.lolokay said:I mean in this situation - like, charging someone for having a baby. probably didn't come out how I meant
I don't think it's entirely random. Surely we wouldn't want this man to breed any more:moll. said:You make a valid point.
But still, you can't plan on random genetic mutations.
Quite a nasty assumption to make that the rich are smarter...did anyone else hear about the Xavier College fiasco? But im at a fairly scummy public school, so I'm biased. Despite the school being scummy, most of the people there are OK. I reckon a better idea would be harsher penalties for violence, assault, rape, pedophilia, etc. Maybe vasectomies to all the rapists.moll. said:No.
It didn't.
But i get what you mean.
And i'm an economics student, so i tend to see the whole world in terms of opportunity cost, so by placing a tax on stupid babies it makes them less desirable etc.
It also solves market failure, for not taking into account the social cost of raising a stupid baby.
Yeah, i considered that method too, but such a law would necessitate the use of force, of which i was trying to avoid. Hence the use of economics.John President said:Quite a nasty assumption to make that the rich are smarter...did anyone else hear about the Xavier College fiasco? But im at a fairly scummy public school, so I'm biased. Despite the school being scummy, most of the people there are OK. I reckon a better idea would be harsher penalties for violence, assault, rape, pedophilia, etc. Maybe vasectomies to all the rapists.
Yeah, but that's accepted by society. Forced castration for convicted rapists would be something entirely new, and would then require a turbulent "getting to know you" period. And it's also an absolutist punishment, so it cannot be undone and leaves no room for the off-chance that the accused is innocent.nikolas said:You Force people in jail though