Find the inverse. (1 Viewer)

miithun

New Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
27
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
I don't think you know what you are doing.
You came to the question in the end because you didn't swap the x's and y's.
Anyone else?
 

Aquawhite

Retiring
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
4,946
Location
Gold Coast
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Uni Grad
2013




By the fundamental log property that:





Here's the graph that you will most likely need to draw in the second part which of course you can work out using calculus:

 
Last edited:

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,169
Gender
Male
HSC
2006




By the fundamental log property that:





Here's the graph that you will most likely need to draw in the second part which of course you can work out using calculus:

I don't think that is correct. I'm not sure what you did, but the two functions are not symmetric about y = x.

Is this the full question or is it asking you to evaluate the inverse at a certain number (which can be done without explicitly finding the inverse)?
 

Aquawhite

Retiring
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
4,946
Location
Gold Coast
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Uni Grad
2013
I don't know how to do the initial question.

but alogb = log(b^a)
Yes, I recognise that... I was trying to adapt the idea by basically having the y represent just any number... but just testing a few on the calculator I see that it was wrong. At least I gave it a go.
 

kaz1

et tu
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
6,960
Location
Vespucci Beach
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2018
Doesn't look like HSC, tried it on Maple and got y/LambertW(y)
 

miithun

New Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
27
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
I will provide the full question.
a) Consider the function f(x) = xlnx
i) Show that y=f(x) has minumum turning point at [1/e, -1/e] [2marks]
ii) Hence sketch the curve y=f(x) for x>= 1/e
iii) Draw the sketch of the inverse function of y=f(x) for x>= 1/e

Sorry guys i just realised you don't need to find inverse function because you can just refelct the graph of part ii) over the line y=x
 

tommykins

i am number -e^i*pi
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
5,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Yes, I recognise that... I was trying to adapt the idea by basically having the y represent just any number... but just testing a few on the calculator I see that it was wrong. At least I gave it a go.
Yes I know, not a problem. Minor technicalities.
 

kooltrainer

New Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
659
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
the inverse is : y^y = e^x
dont need to make y the subject..coz its the same thing..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top