What legal defences would a content host have for hosting racist material (in this case a game)?
From my understanding these are the expemtions and none of them seem to offer any defence to this particular situation:
(a) in the performance, exhibition or distribution of an artistic work; or
(b) in the course of any statement, publication, discussion or debate made or held, or any other conduct engaged in, for-
(i) any genuine academic, artistic, religious or scientific purpose; or
(ii) any purpose that is in the public interest; or
(c) In making or publishing a fair and accurate report of any event or matter of public interest.[117]
unless a racist game is considered artistic?
Would it be something like innocent dissemination or is that only for defamation?
help
From my understanding these are the expemtions and none of them seem to offer any defence to this particular situation:
(a) in the performance, exhibition or distribution of an artistic work; or
(b) in the course of any statement, publication, discussion or debate made or held, or any other conduct engaged in, for-
(i) any genuine academic, artistic, religious or scientific purpose; or
(ii) any purpose that is in the public interest; or
(c) In making or publishing a fair and accurate report of any event or matter of public interest.[117]
unless a racist game is considered artistic?
Would it be something like innocent dissemination or is that only for defamation?
help
Last edited: