SuperMike96
Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2013
- Messages
- 253
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2013
I honestly don't think the word discretion is that hard to understand
http://instagram.com/p/fjUzQSvwmY/
http://instagram.com/p/fjUzQSvwmY/
My year seemed to find it pretty hard.....It wasn't as easy as people are making it out to be. It was a really good exam, but probably half the state screwed it.
That's exactly what I'm saying.I honestly don't think the word discretion is that hard to understand
http://instagram.com/p/fjUzQSvwmY/
Haha, we're not allowed to walk out. Some "college policy" rubbish.Pretty much all the boys from the school next door left the hall 1 hour into the exam. Probably won't even get band 3 haha
Oh, we're allowed to leave when we finish. But yeah I'd always stay until the end, like even if I was a faster writer, I would stay, double check what I wrote etc etcHaha, we're not allowed to walk out. Some "college policy" rubbish.
I would never walk out anyway.
No worries.Oh, we're allowed to leave when we finish. But yeah I'd always stay until the end, like even if I was a faster writer, I would stay, double check what I wrote etc etc
p.s. thanks for the sample paragraph you posted in that other thread. I followed the structure, and it made my essay sound much smarter/cohesive
If you're talking about sanctions/pacts between nations, they're legal responses. I thought the World Order questions would be broader tbh, but family was too easy, as was crime and HR and multiple choice and everything else in between.For non-legal mechanisms in world order I discussed Negotiation, compliance, cooperation (as facilitated through sovereignty), jus cogens, R2P and I talked about Amnesty International getting the Arms Trade Treaty adopted by the GA. For legal i mentioned the Australian external affairs power, ICJ rulings, Treaties and the UNSC.
No, just negotiation– not sanctions. I used the AU's negotiations with Kenya to stop the genocide in 2008 as an example.If you're talking about sanctions/pacts between nations, they're legal responses. I thought the World Order questions would be broader tbh, but family was too easy, as was crime and HR and multiple choice and everything else in between.
Literally my experience. Great exam, human rights was bliss, crime was good, MC was good bar 1 or 2, consumer was very broad and easy and family was equally as easy. AhhhhhhMC was fairly simple I might've got a few wrong (1 or 2)
Short Answers couldnt have been easier
The crime question I expected it, apparently it screwed some people
Consumer - broad very easy, family same as consumer though i ran out of time didnt get time to write a conclusion (
I never knew omed does legal.Literally my experience. Great exam, human rights was bliss, crime was good, MC was good bar 1 or 2, consumer was very broad and easy and family was equally as easy. Ahhhhhh
Omed? Forgive me, I'm new to being active on BOS.I never knew omed does legal.
Guess you learn something each day.
While the exam had no major curveballs, I think saying it was 'easy' is a bit to the extreme. The fact that we've been arguing about the multiple choice on the other thread attests to this. Then again, this website is not a representation of the rest of the state. Lots of people from a local high school near where I used to live are exclaiming about the difficulty of the test on facebook...I'm kind of disappointed to see that people found the exam so easy - the course has really being going downhill for a while.