i want to review 2 of my artists
might as well post it on the web so other ppl can take a look....
Artemisia Gentileschi
worked during the Baroque period (17th cent)
Baroque times very patriachal and parochialist
women at bottom of social ladder
women definitely not considered fit for artistry
father orazio introduced her into the artworld, helped her to paint
art teacher raped her
some historians maintain that that is the reason why Gentileschi depicts such dramatic displays of woman victorious over man
critics such as Griselda pollock disagree , say one should not focus on her life more than her paintings.
Judith & Holofernes
uses theatrical 'Chiaroscuro' techique to enhance the drama and action
use of diagonals , strong blues and reds
realistic and dramatic technique
depicts Judith & servant Abra slaying the general
subverts reality - woman at top. male at bottom
appropriates 'male gaze' this time the male vulnerable, fearfully looking at audience
Audience and World
As mentioned b4 , gentileschi's world very male orientated
males very critical of her because she was doing a 'mans thing'
nevertheless some ppl admired her eg she was courtpainter to Charles the 2nd
had a medal dedicated to 'Artemisia Gentileschi - the extraordinary woman painter'
art teacher can be seen as raping her bc he was jealous of her achievements as a woman
Mary Garrard notes however that she is hardly considered famous for an artist of such high calibre.
In today's world she can be seen as one of the originators of the feminist art, someone who challenged established social order
anybody got anything else to add? post it !!
Orlan
contemporary artist
can be seen as a feminist, postmodernist, performance artist
challenges established parameters such as the body as sacred
seeks to make the body as representing an individuals identity bc she says 'skin is decieving. ' says our looks don't represent identity
works in response to todays values ie the notion of appearance . Appearance is everything
nevertheless she parodies appearance. Her performance work had made her the emodiment of exceptional beauty yet she looks abnormal and surreal . Thus perhaps beauty isn't everything
Reconstruction of St Orlan'
Her work is a performance work.
In an operating room. Surgeons dressed up in costume. posters on the wall.
orlan reads text and dictates to the surgeons.
acoustics and visuals . these are transmitted to audience outside
Orlan takes only local anasthetic so she can be conscious throughout the performance.
her facial features are made to represent an amalgamation of Dianna, Venus, the Monal Lisa, etc etc
Audience & world
Postmodern plus feminist and technologically influenced artist
she emphasised the seemingly impossible in the world around her
Audience (obviously) is horrified but in different degrees. ie public criticism would denounce orlan for her crazy antics. on the other hand ppl in the artworld might think she is crazy but they recognise her artistic intention.
Dilemma: Orlan constructs her own boundaries
Who is the audience? are they the surgeons? (but can't the surgeons also be considered the artist)
if that's the case who is the artist????
Finally, if the surgeons perform on orlan, can;t she be considered the artwork ? how can she be artwork audience and artist all at once ? (obviously she can!!)
influenced by Jean Baudrillards 'similacra' . She is hyper real ( a copy of something that doesn't exist!!)
could also be influenced by Barthes death of the author ( can that be applied to art?? ) ie she is playing with G-ds creation
i can't think anybody got anything else t o add?
might as well post it on the web so other ppl can take a look....
Artemisia Gentileschi
worked during the Baroque period (17th cent)
Baroque times very patriachal and parochialist
women at bottom of social ladder
women definitely not considered fit for artistry
father orazio introduced her into the artworld, helped her to paint
art teacher raped her
some historians maintain that that is the reason why Gentileschi depicts such dramatic displays of woman victorious over man
critics such as Griselda pollock disagree , say one should not focus on her life more than her paintings.
Judith & Holofernes
uses theatrical 'Chiaroscuro' techique to enhance the drama and action
use of diagonals , strong blues and reds
realistic and dramatic technique
depicts Judith & servant Abra slaying the general
subverts reality - woman at top. male at bottom
appropriates 'male gaze' this time the male vulnerable, fearfully looking at audience
Audience and World
As mentioned b4 , gentileschi's world very male orientated
males very critical of her because she was doing a 'mans thing'
nevertheless some ppl admired her eg she was courtpainter to Charles the 2nd
had a medal dedicated to 'Artemisia Gentileschi - the extraordinary woman painter'
art teacher can be seen as raping her bc he was jealous of her achievements as a woman
Mary Garrard notes however that she is hardly considered famous for an artist of such high calibre.
In today's world she can be seen as one of the originators of the feminist art, someone who challenged established social order
anybody got anything else to add? post it !!
Orlan
contemporary artist
can be seen as a feminist, postmodernist, performance artist
challenges established parameters such as the body as sacred
seeks to make the body as representing an individuals identity bc she says 'skin is decieving. ' says our looks don't represent identity
works in response to todays values ie the notion of appearance . Appearance is everything
nevertheless she parodies appearance. Her performance work had made her the emodiment of exceptional beauty yet she looks abnormal and surreal . Thus perhaps beauty isn't everything
Reconstruction of St Orlan'
Her work is a performance work.
In an operating room. Surgeons dressed up in costume. posters on the wall.
orlan reads text and dictates to the surgeons.
acoustics and visuals . these are transmitted to audience outside
Orlan takes only local anasthetic so she can be conscious throughout the performance.
her facial features are made to represent an amalgamation of Dianna, Venus, the Monal Lisa, etc etc
Audience & world
Postmodern plus feminist and technologically influenced artist
she emphasised the seemingly impossible in the world around her
Audience (obviously) is horrified but in different degrees. ie public criticism would denounce orlan for her crazy antics. on the other hand ppl in the artworld might think she is crazy but they recognise her artistic intention.
Dilemma: Orlan constructs her own boundaries
Who is the audience? are they the surgeons? (but can't the surgeons also be considered the artist)
if that's the case who is the artist????
Finally, if the surgeons perform on orlan, can;t she be considered the artwork ? how can she be artwork audience and artist all at once ? (obviously she can!!)
influenced by Jean Baudrillards 'similacra' . She is hyper real ( a copy of something that doesn't exist!!)
could also be influenced by Barthes death of the author ( can that be applied to art?? ) ie she is playing with G-ds creation
i can't think anybody got anything else t o add?