Graphics Card (1 Viewer)

HSC-2-EZ

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Messages
1
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
yeh get a 6600gt.

they best on market at the moment.
 

Suic1de

Banned
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
99
Location
Brisbane
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
yeh get a 6600gt.

they best on market at the moment.
No.

Please post up some info Silent_Sniper such as:

  • Budget
  • Monitor Size
  • Level of use
  • Finally if for some strange reason you would say no to a certain card brand (ATI or NVIDIA)
If you can tell me atleast your budget then i'd recommend one.
 

Suic1de

Banned
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
99
Location
Brisbane
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Personally i'd buy a 4870 @ 512MB, maybe 1GB if your monitor is 22'. Not only will this option save you some cash but also provide good performance.

Your other option is perhaps a 285, those were 580 last i checked at MSY. This 285 costs more however it will beat a 4870.

Other notables cards are the 260, one's that have been built on the newer 216 core are better then a 4870 however those ones afaik cost just as much as a 4870.

Otherwise if you wanted top of the line then you could save up another 200 max and buy a 4870x2 or a GTX295 which are both very power house cards.

Hope that helps.

EDIT: Just a note that anything other then the 4870/260 would be overkill on a 19'. Also make sure your power supply can provide sufficient power (usually 2 6 pins or 1 6 and 1 8)
 
Last edited:

wrxsti

Rambo
Joined
Jul 20, 2006
Messages
1,653
Location
Nandos
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Personally i'd buy a 4870 @ 512MB, maybe 1GB if your monitor is 22'. Not only will this option save you some cash but also provide good performance.

Your other option is perhaps a 285, those were 580 last i checked at MSY. This 285 costs more however it will beat a 4870.

Other notables cards are the 260, one's that have been built on the newer 216 core are better then a 4870 however those ones afaik cost just as much as a 4870.

Otherwise if you wanted top of the line then you could save up another 200 max and buy a 4870x2 or a GTX295 which are both very power house cards.

Hope that helps.

EDIT: Just a note that anything other then the 4870/260 would be overkill on a 19'. Also make sure your power supply can provide sufficient power (usually 2 6 pins or 1 6 and 1 8)
HD 4870, no questions!
 

zingerburger

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
317
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
What about the rest of your computer? Where are the specs at? Post up a dxdiag, yo.
 

Suic1de

Banned
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
99
Location
Brisbane
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Good point zinger, no point buying a 4870 if you still have some old pentium 4 to bottleneck it.
 

LordNecro

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
39
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Just a heads up, unless if you want alot of help from me...don't buy the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+.

It is alot of work if you intend to use windows vista 64bit
 

Stoogey

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
202
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Get the 4850/4870, great cards, you wont regret it. Have a look at MSY for some good prices.
 

Sonata

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
455
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
4870x2 or 4870 if u got the money, if u on a budget guess a 8800gt would be fine
 

Gibbatron

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
339
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
if u got $600 to spend then uve got a pretty good range to choose from

hv u got a pcie or a pcie 2.0 m/board

for that money u can probably get a good gtx 260 or 280 or maybe a gtx285 when they come down in price

that is the fastest single core card on the market btw. Really worth buying.

Or u can get another $400 and grab a gtx 295 if ur really after performance lol
 

S.H.O.D.A.N.

world
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
941
Location
Unknown
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I'm on a budget and the computer I'm getting has a 9400M (i.e 9400 GT but uses 256mb of CPU's DDR3 memory). How well will this fare in gaming?

I'm usually a year or two behind the times in the games industry and generally play RPGs anyway, so I'm hoping it'll be fine for at least 3 years.
 

Gibbatron

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
339
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
yeh um, 9400 is a really low end card. if ur only playing low graphics or older games then you will be able to run them, but probably not at full settings.

can you get it upgraded, even to a 9600 or 9800 cause 9400 is really, really base model.

I spose it will be all right for 2 yr old games but if u get the urge to play some newer stuff (Flashpoint 2!!!!), then u'll probably notice pretty slack performance
 

LordPc

Active Member
Joined
May 17, 2007
Messages
1,370
Location
Western Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
yeh um, 9400 is a really low end card. if ur only playing low graphics or older games then you will be able to run them, but probably not at full settings.

can you get it upgraded, even to a 9600 or 9800 cause 9400 is really, really base model.

I spose it will be all right for 2 yr old games but if u get the urge to play some newer stuff (Flashpoint 2!!!!), then u'll probably notice pretty slack performance
interesting theory.

Ive played some of the more recent games on a 9400 and Im not noticing this poor performance you suggest
 

Gibbatron

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
339
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
interesting theory.

Ive played some of the more recent games on a 9400 and Im not noticing this poor performance you suggest
You will get reasonable performance because it is, well, a 9-series card, but compared to some of the bigger names out there, for not that much extra cash, it is pretty crap.

I'm on a budget and the computer I'm getting has a 9400M (i.e 9400 GT but uses 256mb of CPU's DDR3 memory). How well will this fare in gaming?
If the computer is going to be running vista then you will need all of the available memory, and you can't afford to be sacficing some of the ram for graphics. Better to go a card with its own GRAM to minimise performance problems. What are the other specs??
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
2,454
Location
Jamaica
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
atm ATI got the best gpus and the best one now would be the 4870 but if ur on a low scale budget then consider trying to get a 9600 gt 1gb, its very good for playing crysis on very high YouTube - 9600gt crysis very high but for gaming u should also consider about getting other parts like 4gb of RAM or a really good cpu.
 

S.H.O.D.A.N.

world
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
941
Location
Unknown
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
You will get reasonable performance because it is, well, a 9-series card, but compared to some of the bigger names out there, for not that much extra cash, it is pretty crap.
It's built-in. No upgrade possible. Good to know it works with at least average performance.

If the computer is going to be running vista
Don't worry, I'm not a moron. The Windows boot will be XP.

then you will need all of the available memory, and you can't afford to be sacficing some of the ram for graphics. Better to go a card with its own GRAM to minimise performance problems. What are the other specs??
The comp will have 4 GB of RAM and it'll be DDR3 which is about 1 Ghz in speed. Obviously I'd prefer dedicated GPU RAM, but besides that the 9400 (i.e. the one with on-board RAM) is a decent card, right?
 

Gibbatron

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
339
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Im assuming you're getting a laptop, and the 9400m will give you perfectly playable performance on medium settings, but if you try to max out the settings you might notice performance drops - depends a bit on the rest or your system, but 4gb of ddr3 wont let you down either.
 

Kimochi

New Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
11
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
dont be a fool and waste
your money on a 280 or 285
get sli 9800 GTX
from xfx or eVGA
our eyes do not see the difference
in graphics with these high end games
sli 9800's GTX or even sli xfx 9600 GTs
will let you play crisis on max settings
and any other game that is thrown at you
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top