Hard Induction Proofs (1 Viewer)

timeflies

Active Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2013
Messages
211
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
yea i think thats why he posted lol. or maybe just wanted to share some hard questions? :p
 

QZP

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2013
Messages
839
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2014
What have you tried? What are you stuck at?

For the first one, expand the double angle and you'll get it.
The second one is a lot more tricky but I'm trying to find a cleaner method.
 

phoenix159

Member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
79
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
What have you tried? What are you stuck at?

For the first one, expand the double angle and you'll get it.
The second one is a lot more tricky but I'm trying to find a cleaner method.
i got the first one ok but i still need help with the second one
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
The second one is easier (or at least different) by MX2 methods, by starting:







We now need only simplify the complex number on the RHS of (1) and find its imaginary part to find the required sum.





 
Last edited:

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Pointing out that questions of this type (even if they involved no complex numbers) cannot be asked in the Extension 1 course.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Pointing out that questions of this type (even if they involved no complex numbers) cannot be asked in the Extension 1 course.
The following question was asked on the 1992 Sydney Grammar 4u trial:

Consider the sequence defined by



(i) Determine the values of and .

(ii) Show that for and .

(iii) If and , where is a positive integer, prove that .

(iv) What conclusion may be reached as a result of parts (ii) and (iii)?

A question like this requires use of algebra and index laws. The conclusion in part (iv) uses the logic of induction but the response is simply that the general formula is true for all positive integers , and thus allows any member of the sequence to be determined. I can argue that the question is not an induction question, especially if part (iv) is excluded. The question could be extended to summing the series by splitting it into two GPs, making the topic sequences and series.

My point is that the syllabus may not allow a particular question in a particular form, but that doesn't mean the same content can't be examined by restructuring a question. A determined examiner can certainly bend the syllabus in places - not so far as breaking it (which using complex numbers would do for MX1) - but enough that I think paying a lot of attention to what is and is not "allowed" is unwise, especially for students who may be unaware of some subtleties. Predicting boundaries is also problematic for trials and internal papers where the scrutiny given in preparation is less stringent.

Another example: many MX1 students were convinced that binomial theorem questions wouldn't appear in the HSC as preliminary materials, but the 2020 HSC proved that to be incorrect. Any preliminary materials can be covered if they are part of a question on HSC course content.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top