Heat of Combustion - General Thoughts (1 Viewer)

rokkuran-x

New Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
23
Location
Western Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I have a prac exam tomorrow and the topic is heat of combustion

itll be conducting and producign a report for the experiment

wat do u think will be in this exam to help me study for it



i no some things will be in there like molar heat of combustion equations but what else?
 

minijumbuk

┗(^o^ )┓三
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
652
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Most likely the sources of error, ie. why the experimental value of the molar heat of combustion of the fuel was lower than the theoretical value.
They might also ask you how to minimise these losses.

Physical sources of error:
- Heat lost to atmosphere by convection (minimised by enclosing apparatus inside a cardboard box, so minimal heat is lost to surrounding)
- Stirring water can also make the heat of water uniform throughout, so that heat will be evenly distributed, thus measurement of temperature will be more accurate
- Lower distance between the spirit burner and the beaker of water, so that heat transfer is more efficient
- Put a lid on the spirit burner immediately after the prac, so that no excess fuel is vaporised

Chemical sources of error:
- Incomplete combustion: not enough oxygen gas, so that the heat released is less than the heat that would be released when the fuel undergoes complete combustion. (the theoretical value assumes complete combustion)

They might also ask for safety precautions.
You might wanna mention that the heat released is high, so keep distance from apparatus to prevent being burnt. Equipment is fragile, so extra care needs to be taken when handling. The electronic balance is sensitive to heat, so to prevent breaking it, wait until the spirit burner has cooled down before weighing it.
 

Sarah182

Herpes Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
851
Location
Somewhere over the rainbow
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
Why is it that the theoretical heats of combustion are higher than the results that you actually recieve from the experiment?

Shouldn't it be the other way around?
I don't understand?
 

Stephie-Rae

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2008
Messages
96
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
Sarah182 said:
Why is it that the theoretical heats of combustion are higher than the results that you actually recieve from the experiment?

Shouldn't it be the other way around?
I don't understand?
Cause you've got heat that's lost in surroundings? And incomplete combustion. And yeah, all the reasons the person above you said? Why would it be the other way around??

...Yes yes i am doing my english speech *stops procrastinating*
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top