I use the 4 paragraph structure for my essays (only ever written one discovery essay in my lyf though mwhahaha
), but first two paragraphs = same idea. Shove in as many rubric points into the overriding thesis covering this idea. Some rubric points logically lead to one another, e.g. some describe the triggers, a few of them describe the process, some of them describe consequences, so naturally I categorise the rubric points, and come up with an equation
e.g. rubric point x + rubric point y => rubric point z
but ofc it's more complicated than this so more realistically:
rubric point x + rubric point y => rubric point z + (rubric point a => rubric point b)
soz if you don't get me (why am i apologising, everyone's different?). It's just, english is so broad but logical in a way, which is why I like only having two overriding ideas (can explore them in substantially more depth). Repeat the process for idea 2, creating an equation (complex-ish hopefully to maximise coverage of the rubric while making the marker wet and showing off your sophistication). You should now have most, if not all the rubric covered. Remember this is only for two ideas, you could even do it for 3 ideas and mix and match on the day of the exam.
But if you're a basic bitch like me and don't invest too much time into english, then the ideas you come up with are going to be pretty broad and generalised, so don't worry about it not fitting the question. Just make sure you have like a few sentences or so with your own unique insight. The beauty with english is you are never truly fucked because you can make up anything (yes, even quotes if you have half a brain and desperate)
WARNING: this is how I crammed for discovery trials and seeing as I don't have my results yet I can't guarantee anything hur hur hur just trying to help