Sy123
This too shall pass
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2011
- Messages
- 3,725
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2013
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
Wow......It's just backwards multiplication of two numbers. The original number ends in 6, and when multiplied by 4 gets the same number but with a 6 out the front instead of the end:
Multiply by the 4 and carry the 2 (since you multiply by the units and carry the tens)
Multiply by the 8 and carry the 1:
Multiply by the 3 and carry the 3:
Multiply by the 5 and carry the 1:
Multiply by the 1 and carry the 2:
Since we have just 6, we stop here, and so our number is all the numbers we multiplied - 648351 - but we reverse it as we did the multiplcation in the reverse order to get 153846.
I'll give someone else a go for this one, good question =)I was saving this question in case I felt like writing a trial paper, but that doesn't seem likely so here it is. Although it could go in the 3U thread, I thought the solution was quite nice and deserved to be here under "harder 3U" instead.
Consider the following diagram, where PQ is a tangent to the circle:
![]()
An alternative proof for the tangents from an external point theorem.
Part i):
LOL! do the other polynomial question i posted on the 3U marathon threadDo you even know how much u confused me with ur polynomials question, where u made it a^2 not a, that had me going for hours and hours trying to figure out how u got a^2 and it turns out it was a all along lol. Btw If U have a cool conics question can u plz give to me.
From the tangent-secant theorem:I was saving this question in case I felt like writing a trial paper, but that doesn't seem likely so here it is. Although it could go in the 3U thread, I thought the solution was quite nice and deserved to be here under "harder 3U" instead.
Consider the following diagram, where PQ is a tangent to the circle:
![]()
An alternative proof for the tangents from an external point theorem.
From tangent-secant theorem:I was saving this question in case I felt like writing a trial paper, but that doesn't seem likely so here it is. Although it could go in the 3U thread, I thought the solution was quite nice and deserved to be here under "harder 3U" instead.
Consider the following diagram, where PQ is a tangent to the circle:
![]()
An alternative proof for the tangents from an external point theorem.
<a href="http://www.codecogs.com/eqnedit.php?latex=\int \frac{1-x}{1-\sqrt{x}}\: dx" target="_blank"><img src="http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?\int \frac{1-x}{1-\sqrt{x}}\: dx" title="\int \frac{1-x}{1-\sqrt{x}}\: dx" /></a>
Give it a bit of time, I'm working on it right nowHmm perhaps I should give hints for the second part of my question?
Well, no hint for you thenGive it a bit of time, I'm working on it right now![]()
PQ is a tangent, so PQM is a right angle. Without stating the obvious, PM > PQ. PM = PQ when the radius = 0.I was saving this question in case I felt like writing a trial paper, but that doesn't seem likely so here it is. Although it could go in the 3U thread, I thought the solution was quite nice and deserved to be here under "harder 3U" instead.
Consider the following diagram, where PQ is a tangent to the circle:
![]()
An alternative proof for the tangents from an external point theorem.
Moving on from part (i)
We do not know that M is the centre.PQ is a tangent, so PQM is a right angle. Without stating the obvious, PM > PQ. PM = PQ when the radius = 0.
PQ is a tangent, so PQM is a right angle. Without stating the obvious, PM > PQ. PM = PQ when the radius = 0.
^^^We do not know that M is the centre.