HSC 2015 MX2 Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

And of course the physical interpretation is that k represents (something proportional to) some sort of resistance force (air resistance), and as that goes to 0, the ball dropped under gravity has its motion approach that of no resistance.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon







 
Last edited:

glittergal96

Active Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
418
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

And of course the physical interpretation is that k represents (something proportional to) some sort of resistance force (air resistance), and as that goes to 0, the ball dropped under gravity has its motion approach that of no resistance.
Yep :).
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
71
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Just wondering if this is remotely correct:



from this -1/z = -r (1+ isqrt 3) [where r is modulus of -1/z]
rz = 1/ (1+ isqrt3)
r(x+ iy) = (1- isqrt3)/4
but since we know that x =1 can we assume that r = 1/4 and hence y = sqrt 3 ?
thus z = 1- sqrt 3
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Just wondering if this is remotely correct:



from this -1/z = -r (1+ isqrt 3) [where r is modulus of -1/z]
rz = 1/ (1+ isqrt3)
r(x+ iy) = (1- isqrt3)/4
but since we know that x =1 can we assume that r = 1/4 and hence y = sqrt 3 ?
thus z = 1- sqrt 3
This isn't correct. The second line of the working is an incorrect conclusion from the first line; something we could conclude from the first line is that -1/z = r.cis(-2pi/3), where r is the modulus of -1/z (which is the reciprocal of the modulus of z).
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
71
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

This isn't correct. The second line of the working is an incorrect conclusion from the first line; something we could conclude from the first line is that -1/z = r.cis(-2pi/3), where r is the modulus of -1/z (which is the reciprocal of the modulus of z).
Ahh cool, so from -1/z = r.cis(-2pi/3), you could get
-1/z = r.[cos(-2pi/3) + isin(-2pi/3)]
which would net you -1/z = -[r(1+ sqrt3)]/2
and re-arrange to get rz =2/(1+ sqrt 3)


Is that and using that fact that we know x= 1 to find r and y correct?
Thank you so much btw!!
 
Last edited:

Ekman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Messages
1,616
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Re: HSC 2015 4U Marathon

Next Question (relatively easy one):

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top