HSC 2016 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

KingOfActing

lukewarm mess
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,016
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Wait, so would we not be allowed to use hyperbolic functions in exams? Our teacher never told us that, so that's a bit worrying. Would we still be allowed to be all cheeky though and make a substitution like and then just prove a few basic properties before using it, or nah?

Also slightly related, is L'Hospitals allowed? Our teacher also taught our 3U class that, and said we were allowed to use it in exams.
 
Last edited:

JusticeTackle

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
5
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Wait, so would we not be allowed to use hyperbolic functions in exams? Our teacher never told us that, so that's a bit worrying. Would we still be allowed to be all cheeky though and make a substitution like and then just prove a few basic properties before using it, or nah?

Also slightly related, is L'Hospitals allowed? Our teacher also taught our 3U class that, and said we were allowed to use it in exams.
You are truly the king of acting
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

Wait, so would we not be allowed to use hyperbolic functions in exams? Our teacher never told us that, so that's a bit worrying. Would we still be allowed to be all cheeky though and make a substitution like and then just prove a few basic properties before using it, or nah?

Also slightly related, is L'Hospitals allowed? Our teacher also taught our 3U class that, and said we were allowed to use it in exams.
I think it is completely fine, but it's a fair bit to write. However, I do think that if you are sufficiently well practised with hyperbolic substitutions, then the amount of time it takes to do the working with hyperbolic sub and writing out the basic properties of the hyperbolic subs will be faster than doing it through more acceptable means.

I would suggest also practising Euler substitutions, as those are completely acceptable.

L'Hopital's Rule is not accepted. However, the proof is incredibly short, so one must wonder if one could prove it in the middle of the exam and use it...
 

KingOfActing

lukewarm mess
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,016
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

I think it is completely fine, but it's a fair bit to write. However, I do think that if you are sufficiently well practised with hyperbolic substitutions, then the amount of time it takes to do the working with hyperbolic sub and writing out the basic properties of the hyperbolic subs will be faster than doing it through more acceptable means.

I would suggest also practising Euler substitutions, as those are completely acceptable.

L'Hopital's Rule is not accepted. However, the proof is incredibly short, so one must wonder if one could prove it in the middle of the exam and use it...
Alright, thanks. By the way, which proof are you referring to? The one I know only applies to limits to a real number in the case .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top