I didn't say that. Relax.
90 is an awesome UAI. I wholeheartedly agree with you on that. I would love to get that UAI and wouldn't mind whether I get 99 UAI or 80 UAI as long as I get into any of my desired course.
And I also agree with you on the second comment. But that sounds quite contradictory to some extent, doesn't it? You were commenting on how 90ers are geniuses and you are saying now that 90ers are not necessarily geniuses. And that's basically what I meant.
I never meant that 90 is low. I was describing what 90 UAI would basically place student. (i.e. about top 20%)
And if it is top 20%, you would not consider them to be geniuses, would you? That's like 2 people out of 10 people at a typical school.
And please tell me where I said that 99 is a bad UAI or not. I never said that and never will as a student who also aspires to be 90er (hopefully).
And I do certainly wish I got higher marks in my SC but I am highly satisfied with my achievements and I am surprised by my results because my own ability does not actually extend to that in reality. And please tell, doesn't everyone want to get higher result if they had chances? That's my own case.
And I would salute anyone who got great UAI. (not only the 90ers, this includes anyone who did better than they really are). I would actually give claps to those who got 60 than those who got 90 as long as the one who got 60 overcame his/her potential whereas the 90 kid didn't even work hard.
In conclusion, your post absoutely failed to abase my own personality and status as a member here. I am not like what you think I am. I myself would struggle to get 90 if I don't work hard. I am indeed not naturally talented. I am pretty sure moe people than you think exceed my own IQ and personal intelligence.
I forgot to mention that your language disgusts me. This is a highly trivial matter that shouldn't get you pumped.