Indochina Syllabus Sucks (1 Viewer)

[chuckabanjo]

Does anyone else find that the Indochina syllabus sucks? It isn't clear about what it wants from you. For example:

'Political, social, economic and military developments within North and South Vietnam'

and

'Political and social issues in Indochina by 1960'

I would have put the same information in both (except the first one extends for a longer period). The whole thing is impacts, development and consequences points which are so vague and broad.

I was trying to summarise my notes by the syllabus headings but I failed miserably. Instead I just picked my own headings but tried to make sure I could answer all the bullet points. How did everyone else structure their notes?

 

[l.k]

yea a lot of the points are similar its just that when they say Indochina you have to mention Cambodia and Laos. I made my own headings as well and just joined some dot points together. How much should we concentrate on Cambodia?