Inequality Proof Question: Help Needed (1 Viewer)

unclepete667

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2021
Messages
4
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
Hi,

I came across this inequality proof, which I could get parts 1 and 2 out, but not sure how to do part 3. Answers are very vague on what to do, and jump around alot. Any help would be appreciated, on how to approach part 3, or a worked solution that is more then 4 lines.

Thanks
1657703764379.png
 

chilli 412

oo la la
Joined
Apr 13, 2022
Messages
250
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
isnt part 2 (e-1)? i might be tripping but isnt 1/1! + 1/2! + 1/3! +.... = e - 1 ? because the sum from n=0 to infinity of 1/n! = e
or is it in reference to the previous sum in part i
 

unclepete667

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2021
Messages
4
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
isnt part 2 (e-1)? i might be tripping but isnt 1/1! + 1/2! + 1/3! +.... = e - 1 ? because the sum from n=0 to infinity of 1/n! = e
or is it in reference to the previous sum in part i
Part 2 is in referencing the first part, and is really just a show LHS = RHS
 

chilli 412

oo la la
Joined
Apr 13, 2022
Messages
250
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Part 2 is in referencing the first part, and is really just a show LHS = RHS
oh word, any advice on learning this stuff early (preferably without buying a textbook yet) because i was thinking about doing 4u next year
 

unclepete667

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2021
Messages
4
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
Proof, in my view, is the worst topic in 4u. However, if you do want to look at it ahead of time, you can go through Eddie's Woo content or you can try Howard's Textbook, which is free (I'm not sure of what the BOS site thinks of the textbook, I like it, and find it ok). Proof is a lot of Trial and error for me, but if you want to look into stuff early, I'd go for proof or complex numbers.
 

Lith_30

o_o
Joined
Jun 27, 2021
Messages
158
Location
somewhere
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
Uni Grad
2025
Since this is a multi-part question, we probably need to use one of the previous parts.

From part ii we get that

now we need to show that the sum of is equal to the sum of n distinct divisors, so we should try to make n! the subject of the equation.

Simply reorganising the equation gives us a very messy answer which probably will not work.

An alternate path would be to multiply both sides by n!. This gives us n! on one side and a series of additions on the other, which is a good sign.

and this appears to be the solution, since we have n! in the numerator of every term except the last, all of them will be an integer cause the denominator is in between 2 and n!.

We know that this sequence will have n terms cause the first part of the equation (excluding that +1) will have exactly n-1 terms, hence including the +1 will give n terms.

We also know that this will give us divisors of n! because the denominator will cancel out with the numerator. ie which will give a factor of n!

Testing this out for 4!

note how there are exactly four terms

also notice how these are divisors of 24

as required
 

unclepete667

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2021
Messages
4
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
Since this is a multi-part question, we probably need to use one of the previous parts.

From part ii we get that

now we need to show that the sum of is equal to the sum of n distinct divisors, so we should try to make n! the subject of the equation.

Simply reorganising the equation gives us a very messy answer which probably will not work.

An alternate path would be to multiply both sides by n!. This gives us n! on one side and a series of additions on the other, which is a good sign.

and this appears to be the solution, since we have n! in the numerator of every term except the last, all of them will be an integer cause the denominator is in between 2 and n!.

We know that this sequence will have n terms cause the first part of the equation (excluding that +1) will have exactly n-1 terms, hence including the +1 will give n terms.

We also know that this will give us divisors of n! because the denominator will cancel out with the numerator. ie which will give a factor of n!

Testing this out for 4!

note how there are exactly four terms

also notice how these are divisors of 24

as required
Thanks alot. This makes a lot more sense then what they give as the suggested reponse.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top