~ ReNcH ~
!<-- ?(°«°)? -->!
Though it may be simply coincidental or altogether incorrect, I thought I'd mention this:
My school assessment policy states the proportion of each of our exams that should address Component A (bookwork) and Component B (logic and reasoning). This is as follows:
2U: 80% A and 20% B
MX1: 70% A and 30% B
MX2: 60% A and 40% B
Suppose you take the total marks available in each HSC exam (120, 84 and 120 respectively) and calculate the proportion of each exam that should theoretically address the Component A requirement:
2U: 80% * 120 = 96/120
MX1: 70% * 84 = 59/84
MX2: 60% * 120 = 72/120
For 2U and MX1, I'm pretty sure that the Band 6 cut-off has been in the vicinity of the above figures from the data that other BoSers have published. Whether or not that gives a mild indication of where the MX2 cut-off may stand I'm not sure, particularly given the fact that cut-offs change each year. Nevetheless, I thought I'd raise the idea anyway.
My school assessment policy states the proportion of each of our exams that should address Component A (bookwork) and Component B (logic and reasoning). This is as follows:
2U: 80% A and 20% B
MX1: 70% A and 30% B
MX2: 60% A and 40% B
Suppose you take the total marks available in each HSC exam (120, 84 and 120 respectively) and calculate the proportion of each exam that should theoretically address the Component A requirement:
2U: 80% * 120 = 96/120
MX1: 70% * 84 = 59/84
MX2: 60% * 120 = 72/120
For 2U and MX1, I'm pretty sure that the Band 6 cut-off has been in the vicinity of the above figures from the data that other BoSers have published. Whether or not that gives a mild indication of where the MX2 cut-off may stand I'm not sure, particularly given the fact that cut-offs change each year. Nevetheless, I thought I'd raise the idea anyway.
