Do you have any examples for this?
For example, my class always use Bhutan to argue against any of the 'big questions'/'processes' - that of Westernisation, Globalisation and Industrialisation.
You can say that industrialisation is closely connected to the parallel processes of westernisation and globalisation, and is thus hard to evade in an ever-developing and reforming world. Like Fluorescent said, certain countries - such as Bhutan, however, have made conscious efforts and decisions to avoid the overwhelming envelopment of industrialisation; which inevitably facilitates and encourages westernisation and globalisation. Today, Bhutan has modernised - lifting its previous ban on television and internet - whilst remaining dualistic. Its economy is both sustained on agricultural/agrarian means, whilst simultaneously generating industrial output - namely in the form of cement and steel.
From this point of view, it can be argued that industrialisation is not totally inevitable - Bhutan's King maintaining that "Gross National Happiness" was/is more important than the industrially charged "Gross National Product". The country has made a pertinent choice to avoid total industrialisation, and consequently westernisation and globalisation, by retaining focus and emphasis on cultural heritage and traditions; including economic sustenance on/from the land.
Hope that helps!
