R Run hard@thehsc Well-Known Member Joined Oct 7, 2021 Messages 784 Gender Male HSC 2022 May 18, 2022 #1 or is this naming fundamentally flawed? the chlorides should have the lower numbering right?
someth1ng Retired Nov '14 Joined Sep 18, 2010 Messages 5,558 Location Adelaide, Australia Gender Male HSC 2012 Uni Grad 2021 May 19, 2022 #2 The question is written badly because it's 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane and CFC-113a. However, you can still easily do the question as is.
The question is written badly because it's 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane and CFC-113a. However, you can still easily do the question as is.