Is JUAI/SAM/ALBERT calculators accurate???!!! (1 Viewer)

Lordsion

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
105
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
Cause they estimate my UAI to be 96!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's insane.

Nobody has gotten 96 in 15 years at my school.

Are they really as accurate as people say? like 0.5 UAI difference etc .... ????

BTW my highest mark was 93
My lowest mark was 86

I did 5 subjects/10 units.

AND i came second overall at my school in HSC marks. My rankings are really good, 1st in 1 subject second in others.

I was estimating 85!? (in my gut feeling)
 

Kelly47

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2008
Messages
163
Location
Central Coast
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
Yes they are accurate. Albert estimated mine only .15 away from my actual UAI, Sam was abour 2 off. I didn't use JUAI.
 

pritnep

Boredof?
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
3,949
Location
Newcastle
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
What UAI did you get?

I think SAM/JUAI were about 0.5-2 below my UAI. The difference I think you will find is that the stastics and scaling/moderation they use are usually from previous years so they almost never will be spot on.
 

adnan91

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
347
Location
Disney Land
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
einstein was 0.1 off but JUAI was like 1.5 away and SAM was .45 off. But yes sometimes its hard to believe, i could swear that i was going to get max 92 but im soo happy
 

savio23q

Band
Joined
Dec 15, 2007
Messages
394
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
SAM 0.75 overestimated
JUAI 1.25 overestimated
Einstein 0.30 understimated

I think they're generally very close.
 

Deltan

Noob pharmer
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
464
Location
big island
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
congratz on ur UAI!

Einstein seems to be the most reliable when it comes to estimation.
 

nottellingu

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
385
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Einstein was the closest to mine with a 0.05 overestimate. All three calculators were pretty close - nearest 0.2
 

Pwnage101

Moderator
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
1,408
Location
in Pursuit of Happiness.
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
it must be very close at the top end

JUAI: 99.90
SAM: 99.95
Einstein: went crazy and had an error, dont think it handles high aggregates well

actual UAI: 99.90
 

dp624

Active Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
2,326
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
yeah, it's cos the top end has like a 3-4 aggregate gap between each 0.05
for lower end stuff, 1 aggregate makes a lot of different - 0.1 even
 

emytaylor164

Active Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
1,736
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
JUAI and SAM were both accurate with me i think they were like 1 point off
 

SM_Liverpool

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
88
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I've never heard of these UAI estimators till today TBH. Is it only for exam results or for all reuslts during year 12?

-S
 

zer.0.ne

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2007
Messages
28
Location
Greystanes
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
the albert UAI calculator is VERY accurate.. i got a UAI of 91.15 and it estimated me to get a UAI of 91.10. It was only .05 off!!

But i enetered my actual hsc scores into it the night before the uai came out.. maybe that why it was accurate.. when i entered results like my trial exam marks it said i'd get a UAI of 75 =/
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top