Dragon Fanatic
Member
To what extent is Freemasonry a religous society?
Does that comply with the criteria? Is it sweet to do?
Does that comply with the criteria? Is it sweet to do?
my question would be...where does it fit into the ISP criteria/set area's?Dragon Fanatic said:To what extent is Freemasonry a religous society?
Does that comply with the criteria? Is it sweet to do?
but at the end of the day, its up to your marker(s) not us...Students learn about:
(A) the nature and variety of beliefs of those who do not accept a religious perspective to life
∑ non-religious lifestyles in Australia – possible strands include:
- agnosticism
- atheism
- hedonism
- humanism
- materialism
(B) beliefs which affect the lifestyles of people who do not accept a religious perspective to life
∑ how some of these beliefs influence the everyday lives of believers/adherents
(C) reasons why people follow this belief system
∑ explore the variety of reasons, for example:
- dissatisfaction
- exploration of different ideas.
easy enough to do re resources etcklaw said:What about mine?
Topic: Religion and the Media
Focus Question: To what extent has the media changed people's points of views on the religion of Islam since September 11? Do Muslims believe these points of views are accurate portrayals of the majority of the Muslim population?
How: Surveys on non-muslims (fellow students, random ppl on the streets, etc) about their views on the religion of Islam before and after 9/11. Then I would interview a muslim (would an authoritative figure be better than a non-authoritative figure? Because I reckon that interviewing a non-authoritative figure would be a more accurate portrayal of the muslim community than an authoritative figure. For example, a Catholic priest may be opposed to contraception and abortion, but the general catholic population may think otherwise. That being said, from a marker's point of view, would it be better to ask an authoritative figure or a non-authoritative figure?)
Any comments/recommendations?