Jewish influence on Australia is problematic (1 Viewer)

[justletmespeak123]

Signifies mental illness

well we could say watching anime signifies mntal illnss but we dont for some reason

 

[Interdice]

well we could say watching anime signifies mntal illnss but we dont for some reason

I haven't watched anime in years. I just think this pfp is funny. Technically it's a rape scene

 

[jane1820]

this website reminds me that maybe after all i am in fact NOT bored of studying

 

[redridinghoodrat]

Honestly... I'd take Nazi Germany/Europe over what Europe has become. Nazis are way too overhated, they just wanted European lands for Europeans. Better than the British/Dutch/French Empires who wanted other people's lands for Europeans. Now Europeans are American sluts, who can't defend themselves, and can't tell a boy from a girl.

And they have a rich race of pedophiles fucking with everyone, stealing wealth, reducing freedoms/rights and overall being a loud pain in the ass. There's a sentence I want to say after this, but I can't, cause of Mossad Minns.

Also I'm not a Neo-Nazi, incase everyone's wondering. My people were actually in the Holocaust in very large numbers. But my people do not belong in Europe, as gays don't belong where I come from

Tell me you don't know about history without telling me you don't know about history.

 

[redridinghoodrat]

Banning of far-right groups has nothing to do with a lack of peacefulness, and the left would happily ban the far-right from any form of protesting if they could.

You didn't actually disagree with me that the right to protest doesn't exist, you're saying you're glad it doesn't

I'm saying their peacefulness is a guise, used to trojan-horse violent fascistic policies into Australian society. This was admitted by much of the leaders of the largest far-right protests last year March For Australia. So yes, I would happily ban far-right protesting if I could because I don't want to become Nazi Australia lol.

 

[redridinghoodrat]

The main argument I keep seeing here is "oh but they do it too. they're racist too lol" So it justifies a genocide? So if a Swedish person was racist to me, it would justify me wiping out their entire ethnicity and culture? For a forum about study resources, a lot of you guys are extremely uneducated

 

[SylviaB]

I'm saying their peacefulness is a guise, used to trojan-horse violent fascistic policies into Australian society. This was admitted by much of the leaders of the largest far-right protests last year March For Australia. So yes, I would happily ban far-right protesting if I could because I don't want to become Nazi Australia lol.

Okay genius, then why don't you want to ban communists from protesting?

 

[SylviaB]

The main argument I keep seeing here is "oh but they do it too. they're racist too lol" So it justifies a genocide? So if a Swedish person was racist to me, it would justify me wiping out their entire ethnicity and culture? For a forum about study resources, a lot of you guys are extremely uneducated

Muslims have been invading, killing, raping and enslaving for 1,400 years. Now they play victim when they're on the receiving end.

 

[redridinghoodrat]

Okay genius, then why don't you want to ban communists from protesting?

Because no communist/socialist group has protested or organized at the scale of far-right organizations recently. You're drawing a false equivalence between the minority far-left and the growing far-right.

 

[redridinghoodrat]

Muslims have been invading, killing, raping and enslaving for 1,400 years. Now they play victim when they're on the receiving end.

This logic is flawed. Just because a group of people have committed atrocities doesn't mean innocents of the same group deserve to suffer for it? The Palestinian child who was born into that culture doesn't know about the 1,400 years of conquest, they only know about the past few years of bombings and killings perpetrated by the Israelis.

 

[SylviaB]

Because no communist/socialist group has protested or organized at the scale of far-right organizations recently. You're drawing a false equivalence between the minority far-left and the growing far-right.

are you fucking dumb lmao far-right demonstrations are tiny compared to left wing protests

 

[SylviaB]

This logic is flawed. Just because a group of people have committed atrocities doesn't mean innocents of the same group deserve to suffer for it?

Weird - every time immigrants do something bad in the west, you dorks invoke colonialism as a reason why europeans deserve it

The Palestinian child who was born into that culture doesn't know about the 1,400 years of conquest, they only know about the past few years of bombings and killings perpetrated by the Israelis.

Cool and I had exctly zero to do with the colonisation of australia, and yet....

 

[redridinghoodrat]

are you fucking dumb lmao far-right demonstrations are tiny compared to left wing protests

Not every leftist is fucking communist and socialist lol And even if we take that logic up, no "communist" has come out and said they want to indirectly embed communist values into society and they need violence to prove their point. You tried to shift the goal post and your logic still doesn't make much sense.

 

[redridinghoodrat]

Weird - every time immigrants do something bad in the west, you dorks invoke colonialism as a reason why europeans deserve it



Cool and I had exctly zero to do with the colonisation of australia, and yet....

I don't think Europeans deserve to be genocided for something their ancestors did. Please give me an example of something that immigrants have done that people say colonialism justifies it happening? If you pull up some "white replacement" theory bullshit, I'm not going to be responding bc a. whites are not "dying out" and b. demographic downturns that try to show so are mostly either due to emigration, lower birthrates and an aging white population.

And who exactly is trying to kill you for the colonization of Australia?

 

[Interdice]

Tell me you don't know about history without telling me you don't know about history.

Do you know why Hitler is hated instead of Winston Churchill and Charles De Gaulle? Cause Hitler murdered white people, Charles and Winston murdered brown people.

I'm not white, and I don't live in Europe, so logically speaking I should like Hitler. Cause Hitler didn't do anything to me. Hitler was actually a supporter of many decolonization programs within colonies. Hitler actually helped the Indian independence movement, and freed Indian POWs. Many Indians and Africans actually revere Hitler, with stores and babies being named after the guy. Only people who got fucked over by Hitler were Jews. But fuck the Jews

One of India's freedom fighters is unironically an Indian Nazi, who led a Nazi army, got a German women pregnant, fought for the Imperial Japanese and died in China. Even Gandhi said he died an honorable death, though "misguided", and even Gandhi was a British shill.

From a neutral view point, Hitler was not the bad guy, and if Hitler's neighbours tried to compromise instead of arguing, no Israel would exist, no LGBTQ would exist, no refugee crisis in Europe, and the world would be a much better place.

 

[Interdice]

Cool and I had exctly zero to do with the colonisation of australia, and yet....

looks at skin color looks back up.... Nothign to do with colonization

 

[redridinghoodrat]

Do you know why Hitler is hated instead of Winston Churchill and Charles De Gaulle? Cause Hitler murdered white people, Charles and Winston murdered brown people.

I'm not white, and I don't live in Europe, so logically speaking I should like Hitler. Cause Hitler didn't do anything to me. Hitler was actually a supporter of many decolonization programs within colonies. Hitler actually helped the Indian independence movement, and freed Indian POWs.

One of India's freedom fighters is unironically an Indian Nazi, who led a Nazi army, got a German women pregnant, fought for the Imperial Japanese and died in China. Even Gandhi said he died an honorable death, though "misguided", and even Gandhi was a British shill.

From a neutral view point, Hitler was not the bad guy, and if Hitler's neighbours tried to compromise instead of arguing, no Israel would exist, no LGBTQ would exist, no refugee crisis in Europe, and the world would be a much better place.

If you're not white and you don't live in Europe then you can't relate to the experiences of those who were ruthlessly murdered by Hitler. Hitler was not hated because he murdered solely white people, Hitler was hated because he murdered anybody who wasn't Aryan or Nordic. Black people, gay people, disabled people, the Communists/Socialists, citizens of the Allied Powers, etc. were all killed by Hitler to fit this goal. If Hitler's neighbors compromised, they would be killed off too. I don't entirely disagree with your viewpoint, as an Indian myself, I believe that Churchill and De Gaulle should be recognized as fascistic and genocidal. But let's not trivialize Hitler's crimes and pretend like it was just "white" people who were the victims of Hitler's ideology. Anybody that opposed Hitler's views was assassinated and that even extended to members of his own party. Nobody was safe under Hitler unless they complied fully and we wouldn't be having this discussion right here if you were completely ready to fully comply to everything an authoritarian said.

Hitler only really supported decolonization in India because it would've weakened Britain and made his plans go by a lot smoother. Hitler often used this method of feigning support or defense only to backtrack when it was convenient for him (look at: Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and Nazi invasion of Soviet Union). He believed that Subash Chandra Bose (the Indian Nazi) would be a valuable asset in weakening British influence over India, but his lack of popularity compared to Gandhi and Nehru stopped them from any meaningful alliance, which I think shows his opportunism. If Hitler truly supported decolonization, he wouldn't associate with Imperial Japan who colonized and murdered millions in the Asia-Pacific and Fascist Italy who colonized Ethiopia and Libya brutally.

The world would be a far WORSE place if Hitler had succeeded and we likely wouldn't be alive to be having this discussion.

 

[Interdice]

The world would be a far WORSE place if Hitler had succeeded and we likely wouldn't be alive to be having this discussion.

If the British didn't colonize India, you wouldn't be alive to have this discussion, because of the butterfly effect. NO point in using that argument.

And even if Hitler did succeed, India would get freedom earlier than 1947. The Congress was a functional government since the 1920s. More likely than not Bangladesh and Pakistan would be part of India. Tho I don't know if that would make India better or worse.

Hitler was hated because he murdered anybody who wasn't Aryan or Nordic. Black people, gay people, disabled people, the Communists/Socialists, citizens of the Allied Powers, etc. were all killed by Hitler to fit this goal

Nice one. You forgot "Roma". I'm pretty sure Roma were the largest ethnic group that Hitler mass murdered. How many SubSaharan Africans were actually in Europe? I guarantee you the allies killed way more Africans than Hitler ever did.

Yes Hitler murdered all the above groups. But he also murdered the people(French, Dutch, British), who were murdering Black, Muslims, Asians and Indians in even greater numbers. So we would have to subtract the deaths that the Europeans caused during WW2.

British killed 800000(Low range) Indians in Bengals. Hitler killed 500000(high range) Roma in Europe. If Hitler destroyed the UK before the famine, he would save 800000 Indians. 800000-500000 = 200000. One could interpret this as saying Hitler was trying to save hundreds of thousands of Indians.

If you're not white and you don't live in Europe then you can't relate to the experiences of those who were ruthlessly murdered by Hitler

No. But I can relate to the people who were ethnically cleansed in my country, and feel less sympathy the Europeans being killed, while they were killing my people. Obviously I care more about my people than foreigners

Hitler only really supported decolonization in India because it would've weakened Britain and made his plans go by a lot smoother. Hitler often used this method of feigning support or defense only to backtrack when it was convenient for him (look at: Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and Nazi invasion of Soviet Union). He believed that Subash Chandra Bose (the Indian Nazi) would be a valuable asset in weakening British influence over India, but his lack of popularity compared to Gandhi and Nehru stopped them from any meaningful alliance, which I think shows his opportunism. If Hitler truly supported decolonization, he wouldn't associate with Imperial Japan who colonized and murdered millions in the Asia-Pacific and Fascist Italy who colonized Ethiopia and Libya brutally.

Hitler would have killed every non Nordic Aryan if he could. BUT he couldn't. The he couldn't is the key part.

Assuming you were living in 1940s Madras, and you were educated, you would be cheering for Hitler to crush the British, cause you don't know when a famine would strike Madras, and the British would redirect supplies. Sure Hitler would want to kill you. But his German army wouldn't have been able to project in India.

If you are from people who were colonized by the British, French or Dutch, it makes no sense to not be a Hitler supporter. I'm honestly surprised more non Nazi Hitler/Axis supporters don't exist.

 

[SylviaB]

Not every leftist is fucking communist and socialist lol And even if we take that logic up, no "communist" has come out and said they want to indirectly embed communist values into society and they need violence to prove their point. You tried to shift the goal post and your logic still doesn't make much sense.

the FUCK are you talking abou lmao

that's what communism is! It's a belief there should be a literal revolution to overthrow the government, and this revolution is of course to be acheived through violence

 

[SylviaB]

Hitler was not hated because he murdered solely white people, Hitler was hated because he murdered anybody who wasn't Aryan or Nordic. Black people, gay people, disabled people, the Communists/Socialists, citizens of the Allied Powers, etc. were all killed by Hitler to fit this goal.

No he fucking didn't LMAO you are beyond ignorant, jfc