MedVision ad

law questions (1 Viewer)

Sathius005

Active Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
716
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2008
Uni Grad
2018
1) Why do we need law?

Law is regulations emanating from government and applicable to people via legislation, custom and policies recognised and enforced by judicial decision. We need law to provide a complex system of social control, regulating conduct, provides rules for governing relationships, sources of protection and provides the glue for a civilised society. If we didn’t have law in Australia we would be living under anarchy. Law is a mechanism of compensation for the plaintiff whose rights have been violated (civil law) and a mechanism of punishment for the accused (criminal law). For example if a man does premeditated murder of his wife and her secret lover and pleads not guilty, he is usually sentenced to two life sentences and has to be in jail for life. Murder is a serious offence and in this case it is said that justice has been done to the victims of the murderer as a result of the judge’s verdict.

If you had to mark this question out of five marks what would you give my mini essay answer?
 

SylviaB

Just Bee Yourself 🐝
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
6,896
Location
Lidcombe
Gender
Female
HSC
2021
Re: Do you respect the Australian legal system?

Commits*
 

funkshen

dvds didnt exist in 1991
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
2,137
Location
butt
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: Do you respect the Australian legal system?

4.5/5. I deducted half a mark for missing the obvious links to Australian Neoconservatism.
 

Sathius005

Active Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
716
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2008
Uni Grad
2018
Re: Do you respect the Australian legal system?

Distinguish between the Doctrine of Reception, Mabo judgement and the Wik judgement (6 marks).

The Doctrine of Reception states that Australia was terra nullius at the time of settlement which meant that Australia was unoccupied at the time of settlement.

The Mabo judgement overturned the Doctrine of Reception by stating that Australia was acquired by settlement and that Australia was not terra nullius at the time of settlement. This meant that Indigenous people had rights to native title which could not survive the grant of a pastoral lease.

The Wik judgement said that native title can coexist with pastoral leases but in the event of conflict the rights of the pastoralist will prevail.

What would you grade my response to the above question out of six marks?
 

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
I'm surprised at how bothered Sathius is to make these threads.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top