Lazseeker-Marks vs Percentiles! (1 Viewer)

[Butterfly_Wings]

I'm interested to see the difference people are getting between their results using their marks compared to their percentiles to estimate their UAI...

For me:
Using marks- 94.65
Using percentage- 90.40

I KNOW I'm not getting the first estimate...and even the percentage estimate still seems a little high for my results, but I estimated my percentile as best I could think to... I'd be interested to see how far other peoples estimates dropped to get a better idea.

 

[hornet]

Originally posted by Butterfly_Wings
I'm interested to see the difference people are getting between their results using their marks compared to their percentiles to estimate their UAI...

For me:
Using marks- 94.65
Using percentage- 90.40

I KNOW I'm not getting the first estimate...and even the percentage estimate still seems a little high for my results, but I estimated my percentile as best I could think to... I'd be interested to see how far other peoples estimates dropped to get a better idea.

Yeah I agree. My marks result was 96.30, and my percentage was 93, however I redid it being very harsh (like docing 5 percentile for every subject), and got 91.50

I'm happy with all of em

I wonder just how accurate it is...

 

[Morgues]

92 using percentiles
97 using lazseeker

who knows......

 

[Minai]

mm..
96.40 normal lazseeker

94.55 with percentiles

so im estimating 90-91 in reality (or mayb worse.. )

 

[Lazarus]

Don't use the normal version of LazSeeker with marks - the UAI it reports will be too high.

We think that the advanced version with percentiles should be a fairly good ballpark figure.

Links to full band stats and other info here:
http://boredofstudies.org/bands.html

Natstar - around 75.

 

[Ultimate]

99.5 on normal lazseeker
98.85 on percentiles ........ grrr

 

[flyin']

percentiles! percentiles! percentiles!

 

[!meeee!]

hmmmm... mine was better with percentiles
but i think that's due to my subjects

 

[BlackJack]

Lazseeker percentiles gave me a lower estimate than the actual UAI, marks into the adv. lazseeker gave me higher by a slightly smaller margin.

I think you could use lazseeker and put both in for a min-max range...

 

[Butterfly_Wings]

My Actual UAI was like right in the middle of my 2 estimates...lazseeker predicted 96.54, percentages 90.40, and my UAI was 92.00 .I was pretty harsh with my percentages though...

 

[BlackJack]

Harshness counteracts the false hope from the marks based UAI. THis is nothing to worry about as you can than take the average (much closer).

 

[stella_hermawan]

well... i'm afraid of getting low uai...
if i have math 7
ext 1 7
business 8
sdd 8
physic 7
indo background speaker 8
eenglish sec language 8
how much will i get? will it be over 8 point something?

i would like to take business as my major, i'm i afraid i couldn't..........

 

[Smurfwow]

nice necro

 

[Slidey]

What's with the thread revival?

 

[Lazarus]

This thread is now completely out of date and totally irrelevant - closed.