• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

leehuan's All-Levels-Of-Maths SOS thread (5 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

parad0xica

Active Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
204
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
That doesn't look correct. The corollary of the triangle inequality does not state |a-b| < |a|-|b|

the closest I know of is ||x|-|y||<|x-y|

But that contradicts what you suppose.
What about

|x + y| < |x| + |y|

Let y = -y,

|x - y| < |x| + |-y| = |x| + |y|?
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Please check this proof. I feel I might've accidentally assumed too much





 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Redo with the triangle inequality amended to not use the corollary:







EDIT: WOAH OK WAIT..
 
Last edited:

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Okay, here's what I have thought of... Something similar appeared in the lecture I crashed that day... IDK

 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Okay, here's what I have thought of... Something similar appeared in the lecture I crashed that day... IDK

It did but that looks so tedious to deal with... nor do I actually know HOW to deal with it
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015


Edit: Nvm if sin^-1(-x)=-sin^-1(x) then the result might fall out by just changing the last few steps.

But just remind me why we don't have to consider [-pi/2,0]?
 
Last edited:

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
WLOG it is. Anyway bump

Please check this proof. I feel I might've accidentally assumed too much





+ New question (under a continuity topic, but I've done limits as well of course)



Edit nvm this question, just realised stationary points can be combined with the intermediate value theorem. Just check the proof please.
 
Last edited:

parad0xica

Active Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
204
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
WLOG it is. Anyway bump



+ New question (under a continuity topic, but I've done limits as well of course)



Edit nvm this question, just realised calculus can be combined with the intermediate value theorem. Just check the proof please.
Proof looks good.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Just out of curiosity, is there a name we define for the family of polynomials f(x)=x^n (n in Z+) rather than f(x) = ax^n+bx^(n-1)+etc
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015


This sounds like it's asking me to prove the max-min theorem, or at least the latter. How does this work?
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007


This sounds like it's asking me to prove the max-min theorem, or at least the latter. How does this work?
Call it the extreme value theorem, the term "max-min" and "min-max" occur a ton in other contexts.

How you should prove it will depend on exactly what you have learned, typically you assume this theorem without proof in most first year courses. (For good reason, discussion of things like compactness distract a bit from learning calculus which is the main point of first year calculus course).

Have you heard of any of the following?

-Compactness
-Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem
-Heine Borel theorem
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 5)

Top