• Want to help us with this year's BoS Trials?
    Let us know before 30 June. See this thread for details
  • Looking for HSC notes and resources?
    Check out our Notes & Resources page

Legal Half Yearly Study Thread (2 Viewers)

goan_crazy

Hates the waiting game...
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,225
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
bump for the study thread...
u guys r worrying bout ur 1/2 yearlies
im worried about my operation im having tomorrow
and i dont know how long it will take for me to recover
im worrying about whats gonna actually happen with my 1/2 yearlies :(
 

goan_crazy

Hates the waiting game...
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,225
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Murf said:
vBulletin Message

Sorry, you can not add yourself to your own buddy list.
dont worry murf ur on my buddy list... buddy :)
 

melsc

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Messages
6,365
Location
Chasing ambulances in the Inner West...
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
I am so lost 2day...I'm overworked...and stressed...ahhh well welcome to yr 12...u know the christian group at our skool put brekky in the senior study 4 us and flowers with a card saying good luck 4 the 1/2 yealies...arent they sweet!
 

goan_crazy

Hates the waiting game...
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,225
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
types of crime
o Offences against the person
o Economic offences-white collar crimes & offences against property
o Offences against the State
o Drug offences
o Public order offences
o Traffic offences
o ‘Victimless’ crimes
o Preliminary crimes

elements of crime
actus reus
mens rea
causation
For a person to be found guilty of a criminal offence the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that both actus reus and mens rea existed when the offence occurred.

DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN SUMMARY (minor) and INDICTABLE (serious) CRIMES:
o SUMMARY OFFENCES
- Heard by magistrates (no jury)
- Heard by Local court
- Relatively minor
E.g. traffic offences
- Jurisdiction: 0-$40000

o INDICTABLE OFFENCES:
- serious criminal offence
- tried with judge and jury
E.g. murder, sexual assault
- Jurisdiction >$750000
- Tried by district and supreme court

O THE PARTIES TO A CRIME:
1. PRINCIPAL IN THE FIRST DEGREE-person who actually commit the main offence.
2. PRINCIPAL IN THE SECOND DEGREE- Person who was present, assisting in committing the offence.
3. ACCESSORY BEFORE THE FACT: the person who helped plan the offence but were not there when it occurred
4. ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT: Person who, knowing about the crimes, helped the offender afterwards

defences:
COMPLETE DEFENCES: Defences which entitle the accused to an acquittal.
a) Involuntary behaviour
b) Compulsion (duress and necessity)
c) Insanity
d) Self-defence
e) Consent of the victim.

PATIAL DEFENCES: Defences which allow a charge to be, reduced to a lesser one. E.g. murder to manslaughter.
f) Diminished responsibility
g) Provocation

discretion
the power to make different choices

-THE CRIMINAL PROCESS:
1. Reporting crime
2. Investigation, arrest and charge
3. Bail
4. Plea, hearing (evidence, procedure, including the role of juries)
5. Personnel (police, prosecutors, defence lawyers, magistrates, judges)

legal aid-assistance to people who cannot afford legal aid

the people must pass 3 tests
means test
merit test
jurisdictional test

types of international crme
crimes commited outside a national jurisdiction
transnational crimes
crimes against the international community

sources of int crime:
treaties, conventions, customary int law, agreements, declarations blah etc

WHY DO PEOPLE OBEY THE LAW?
There are 3 reasons:
1. education
2. regulation
3. cohesion

crime prevention
social
sitautional

PURPOSES OF PUNISHMENT:
There are 3 types of punishment:
1. RETRIBUTION: Punishment is deserved by an offender
2. DETERRENCE: Punishment deters other from offending
3. REHABILITATION (REFORM): Punishment reforms offenders.
Two recent theories are:
1. INCAPICITATION: Restricting offenders for a period of time.
2. REINTEGRATIVE SHAMING: Re-socialising the offender by showing them the harm they have done.


no i dont know all of the above
thats jus copied from my notes :)
 

elissa

Water xXx
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
183
Location
Laurieton
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
joe_m_2000 said:
Indictable offence - Jurisdiction >$750000
joe - shouldnt it be a lower amount?
my assessment stimulus material was $15,000 and i looked it up in law handbook and legislation and it said $5000 needed the only the prosecution to agree to it been heard summarily, $15,0000 needs both parties

THEREFORE (LOL) - amount for indictable offence should be below $750,000

Local court - $0-40,000
district court - $40,000-750,000
supreme court-$750,000

joe_m_2000 said:
means test
means test DOESNT apply in criminal cases

Legal aid doesn't apply in domestic violence cases or traffic offences - unless there is reasonable belief the offender, if found guilty will go to jail.
 

goan_crazy

Hates the waiting game...
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,225
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
law reform is also important. forgot 2 put that

law reform commissions:
definition: bodies established by state and federal governments to systematically investigate various areas of the law and make recommendations for change (through discussion papers), the community have input

*OTHER AGENCIES
• OMBUDSMAN:
- Investigates administration of government departments and recommends changes to govt
• ROYAL COMMISSIONS:
- Investigate areas of concern and make recommendations to govt E.g. Police Royal Commission
• THE CORONER:
- Investigates suspicious deaths/fires and recommends charges to the DPP
- Coronial enquiries expose weaknesses in the law
 

melsc

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Messages
6,365
Location
Chasing ambulances in the Inner West...
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
The elements of a crime
Mens rea – Is literally the guilty mind, it needs to be proven in all cases excluding stricti liability cases. Mens rea can take the form of intention, guilty aforethought, reckless indifference and negligence. Children under the age of 10 and people suffering from a mental illness are deemed unable to form mens rea. Intention is established by Mc Connell V R 1977 1 NSWLR 714. Recklessness established by Hyam V DPP (1974) 2 ALL E.R 41.
Actus reus – is the second requisite element of a crime, it is the performance of a guilty/wrongful act or omission that breaks the criminal law. It must be voluntary.
Causation – The act that was performed must have also caused the crime that took place, the act must be the ‘operative and substantial’ cause of the crime, i.e. that it was the ultimately responsible for the offence. Established by Blaue V R (1975) 1 WLR 1411.

Anyone who did mock trial knows all abt the elements of the crime LOL
 

melsc

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Messages
6,365
Location
Chasing ambulances in the Inner West...
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
My exam was ok...we had shoirt answer on human rights/law and society and two case stuudies for crime...i am an idiot tho....i mixed up natural justice and rule of law! :( oh well onli 2 marks
 

~*HSC 4 life*~

Active Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
2,411
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
best way to be prepared for exams:

have CASE STUDIES!!!!!!!! for the love of god have case studies to back everything up, its just like english, evidence gets you marks..remember "luke cuddle me darling" are the equivalent of 'techniques' in the english syllabus, ok :p so its very important

secodnly, to help me memorise types of crime etc, think of an acronym
 

goan_crazy

Hates the waiting game...
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,225
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Law reform case study dietrich v. queen
the elements of crime case studies as melsc said
Rv Mconnel - intention
R v Blaue - Causation
and also hyam v. ddp which she didnt mention-recklessness :)
 

melsc

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Messages
6,365
Location
Chasing ambulances in the Inner West...
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
joe_m_2000 said:
Law reform case study dietrich v. queen
the elements of crime case studies as melsc said
Rv Mconnel - intention
R v Blaue - Causation
and also hyam v. ddp which she didnt mention-recklessness :)
I am not perfect joe... Ok smart arse wat abt Longey V ABC - Implied right of freedom of speech, Zeveic V DPP Self defence, RV Dudly and stevens - necessity (lol i had my legal exam 2dai)

I will neva forget my 1st legal lesson every my teacher taught us Luke Cuddle Me Darling...finally somsone else uses it
 

goan_crazy

Hates the waiting game...
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,225
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
i havent heard of those case studies melsc, im sorry ur 2 good ;)
ps its R V Dudley and stevens - necessity

for law and society theres the carbonic smokeball case
and donohouge v. stevenson-nearly wrote something like donovon-stupid casey donovan :mad:

for family law
definition of marriage-hyde v. hyde
backed up with corbett v. corbett which defined transexuals not included
however kevin case 2001 set the new precedent that transexuals were included
:uhhuh:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top