Mathematics (2 Viewers)

[airie]

How about those imaginary numbers those 4 unit kids talk about?

How does that contradict things you know? It just tells you that there are more than you previously assumed

(Even for those quadratics where the discriminant is less than zero, we've always written "no real solutions", instead of "no solutions" )

 

[Martyno1]

I do 2U Maths. I love it, it's my favourite subject.

 

[IceOnFire]

I do 2U Maths. I love it, it's my favourite subject.

Are you French?

Or you just like the French flag for some strange, STRANGE reason.

 

[Martyno1]

Are you French?

Or you just like the French flag for some strange, STRANGE reason.

I'm 1/4 French, why??

 

[IceOnFire]

I'm 1/4 French, why??

Just asking...

 

[Martyno1]

Just asking...

Ok, well the rest of me is Lebanese but I didn't think I'd get such a great reception if I had the Lebanese flag as my avatar..

 

[IceOnFire]

Ok, well the rest of me is Lebanese but I didn't think I'd get such a great reception if I had the Lebanese flag as my avatar..

I really don't care whether you are Lebanese or French, so welcome to BOS anyways.

Back to topic, Mathematical induction is giving me a headache, too much writing for my liking. :mad1:

 

[SoulSearcher]

Back to topic, Mathematical induction is giving me a headache, too much writing for my liking. :mad1:

Induction's fun, except for that extension 1 induction question they asked in this year's exam

 

[Nesty]

no more maths for me finishing maths off is a beauty.

damn dun even get me started on the ext 1 induction question. i thought i was gonna get an easy induction so love induction. oh wells. happy to be done with maths.

 

[SoulSearcher]

no more maths for me finishing maths off is a beauty.

Lucky

Thinking about a distinction course?

 

[Nesty]

haha. nah. thanks but no thanks. dun love maths that much

 

[SoulSearcher]

Distinction courses don't have a lot of math, if any in them, depending on which one you choose

 

[m0ofin]

How does that contradict things you know? It just tells you that there are more than you previously assumed

(Even for those quadratics where the discriminant is less than zero, we've always written "no real solutions", instead of "no solutions" )

Heh, dunno. I've always written "no solutions" though

Lucky Nesty, good on you

 

[Nesty]

nah i should enjoy my maths-less school life now.

i always wrote no solutions too. the unreal roots just never crossed my mind

 

[SoulSearcher]

Pfft as if you'll drop, Soul.

Asked me that question a year ago, I would have said that I would have dropped maths at the end of this year.

 

[SoulSearcher]

Hehe, I saw that question in my Harder 3 unit section of my 4 unit prep...

So lucky. =)

I saw the first part in the Excel textbook, the second part fucked me up

 

[Riviet]

I saw the first part in the Excel textbook, the second part fucked me up

Did you get the induction eventually?

 

[SoulSearcher]

Did you get the induction eventually?

Nope

 

[Riviet]

Nope

From what I remember during the exam, rearranging the result in part (i) helped with the proof step in the induction.

 

[pLuvia]

The induction was lengthy but it eventually came out even if you didn't prove that first part and just used the result. I for one just gave up on the first bit and just used the result