madsam
God among men
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2008
- Messages
- 250
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2009
Ok, we've been given a rather hard maths induction question that is too long and stuff to post up.
Anyway, i can do all of it except for the prove for n = k+1, like i can prove for n = 1,2,3 and stuff
My question is, since these things are marked out of 4 or 5 generally, and one mark is in the conclusion, if i cant prove for n = k+1, but then i go and right a conclusion saying, since it is true for n = 1,2,3 and n = k+1 it must be true for all n, would i still get a mark? Or would they go no, since you never proved it for n = k+1 you dont get a mark?
Does it matter that your supposed to get a mark for correctly writing the conclusion?
Anyway, i can do all of it except for the prove for n = k+1, like i can prove for n = 1,2,3 and stuff
My question is, since these things are marked out of 4 or 5 generally, and one mark is in the conclusion, if i cant prove for n = k+1, but then i go and right a conclusion saying, since it is true for n = 1,2,3 and n = k+1 it must be true for all n, would i still get a mark? Or would they go no, since you never proved it for n = k+1 you dont get a mark?
Does it matter that your supposed to get a mark for correctly writing the conclusion?