millikan's experiment (1 Viewer)

{*(00)*}

New Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
29
Location
sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
(the oildrop in the magnetic field experiment)
why does the results in milikan's experiment vary, why isn't the charge of an electron exactly -1.602 x 10^-19? and what was the thing that millikan needed to realise in his experiment in order to realise the correct results?.... thanks {*(00)*}!
 

alcalder

Just ask for help
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
601
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Millikan was using charged particles of oil not just single electrons. Sometimes the oil would gain a charge of 1e- and sometimes more(2e-, 5e- etc) , but he always found the charge to be a multiple of the charge on an electron.

Therefore Millikan realised that the common factor between all the charge he was measuring was that they were all a multiple of -1.602 x 10-19.

Does that help?
 

{*(00)*}

New Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
29
Location
sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
alcalder said:
Millikan was using charged particles of oil not just single electrons. Sometimes the oil would gain a charge of 1e- and sometimes more(2e-, 5e- etc) , but he always found the charge to be a multiple of the charge on an electron.

Therefore Millikan realised that the common factor between all the charge he was measuring was that they were all a multiple of -1.602 x 10-19.

Does that help?

yup! thanks. but how did he know that -1.602 was a common factor? was it just trial and error?
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
{*(00)*} said:
was it just trial and error?
It would have been for him, he would have seen a pattern eventually after doing the experiment several times.
 

{*(00)*}

New Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
29
Location
sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
does anyone know who found the mass of an electron?
jj thompson found the charge to mass ratio...
then millikan found the charge...
but how did he find the charge without first knowing the mass? he may have known the equation m=vd but how did he know the volume of the oil drop and the density?
and what is terminal velocity?
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
{*(00)*} said:
what is terminal velocity?
Basically, terminal velocity is the velocity at which an object in free fall does not accelerate and falls at constant speed.
 

alcalder

Just ask for help
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
601
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Millikan measured the terminal velocity of the oil drop when it fell under only the influence of gravity.

Then he used an oil of known density. Fluid mechanics was then brought in.

(THis is from the old syllabus elective - Physics in Technology, so probably not relevant but it shows how he did it.)

Stokes Law
F = 6πrηv where:
F is the frictional force on particle falling with terminal velocity through a viscous fluid r is the Stokes radius of the particleη is the fluid viscosity (known), andv is the terminal velocity (measurable)
But if a particle is falling with terminal velocity then the weight force is balanced by both the buoyant force of the viscous fluid and the viscous Force.

Oil has density p (known)
Viscous Fluid it falls through has density p' (known)

weight = mg
= volume x density x g
= 4/3 π r 2 p g

buoyant force = 4/3 π r 2 p' g

So
weight = buoyant force + viscous force
4/3 π r 2pg = 4/3 π r 2p' g + 6πrηv

Thus fluid viscosity is
η = 2 r2g(p-p') / 9v

He knows p, p',
η so he can work out radius of the oil drop.

From this he could determine the volume and hence mass of the oil drop.
You don't need to know this, but it may help in your understanding. It is proably enough to say, "using fluid mechanics and an oil of known density, he determined the radius of the oil drop and hence the mass."


BTW: If you reach terminal velocity, it certainly is. LOL
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top