Modern History Predictions/Thoughts (3 Viewers)

[cheesynooby]

anyone doing conflict in the pacific, usa 1919-1941 and civil rights in usa

me maybe :0

 

[quokka]

me maybe :0

do u do all of them whats ur predictions

 

[erin_4school]

im scared for civil rights they give a 6 marker on specific people like their aims

if its malcolm x i will cry. i still have no clue what that guy actually did apart from speeches talking abt Black pride, nationalism and militarism -- like did his group do any protests? (ik they wouldn't do like marches cause they didnt like the non-violence approach) but what did he actually do????

 

[lovepulsar]

Anyone have any predictions for apartheid or cold war?

im thinking renewal has gotta be on there like theres no way

 

[samdaman33]

Anyone have any predictions for apartheid or cold war?

i think there'll be one on Mandela's life specifically, like a 4 or 5 marker where you just focus on him because he's such a big part of the course that hasn't really been explicitly examined yet

 

[lovepulsar]

yeah mandelas lowkey guaranteed, i was also guessing just the overall end to apartheid and transition to democracy?

 

[samdaman33]

yeah mandelas lowkey guaranteed, i was also guessing just the overall end to apartheid and transition to democracy?

i hope not but probab;y

 

[erin_4school]

also we cant get an essay q on survey content can we? like for russia we couldn't just get a q on the treaty of brest litovsk?

 

[samdaman33]

also we cant get an essay q on survey content can we? like for russia we couldn't just get a q on the treaty of brest litovsk?

no we can't, but i think they can say what was the significance of treaty of brest litovsk on another part of the syllabus but thats a bit of a gray area

 

[erin_4school]

no we can't, but i think they can say what was the significance of treaty of brest litovsk on another part of the syllabus but thats a bit of a gray area

bruhhhh now i actually need to learn some stats for the tob-l

 

[Snoopy:)]

also we cant get an essay q on survey content can we? like for russia we couldn't just get a q on the treaty of brest litovsk?

Surely not that is such a niche area, how are we to write an entire essay on it!?

 

[Snoopy:)]

I'm just going based on my teacher idk if it's helpful - it's entirely based on directive term and mark allocation. You should be spending 1.8 minutes max on each mark (45 minutes/25 marks) - unless you're quick or you want more time in essays

Take from the directive term: identify (literally just state in 1/2 sentences for each mark allocation), Account for (you need a few reasons prob n-1 or n-2 depending on question). the long SAQ (10-15 marks) - 3 paragraphs with a 1 sentence intro. tbh i just content dump in the long SAQ (but still keep judgement or directive term at forefront).

To bounce off this, if its like 2-3 marks and it says identify, literally just write an opening sentence then dot point the answers!
My teacher said that was ok and it helps save time cause it takes like a minute.

 

[cheesynooby]

do u do all of them whats ur predictions

hehe yess
im on 12 units tho and its not rlly counting so im barely trying
uhhhh predictions uhhhhh idk maybe a occupation qn for the pacific

 

[erin_4school]

whats the chances of a pre 1964 q for indochina?

 

[ralseiawesomefuntime]

whats the chances of a pre 1964 q for indochina?

pre 1964 was in 2021 and 2020 methinks so like moderate chance

 

[The Castle]

whats the chances of a pre 1964 q for indochina?

Indochina will probably be strategies and tactics and something on Cambodia/Laos

 

[erin_4school]

Indochina will probably be strategies and tactics and something on Cambodia/Laos

but they did c/l in 2023kind of

 

[Lee Harvey Oswald]

for questions about the "value" of a source do you write about the limitations or do you just glaze it? i usually try to point out flaws in the source but idk it's worth my time for a lower mark question

 

[The Castle]

for questions about the "value" of a source do you write about the limitations or do you just glaze it? i usually try to point out flaws in the source but idk it's worth my time for a lower mark question

Assess = For/Against
Explain = For

 

[ogmvvs]

predictions for japan 1904-1937 and conflict in europe?