Motion + Integration (1 Viewer)

kurt.physics

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
840
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
so i didn't realise i didn't do this exercise and i left it for a week and it seems i've forgotten how to do half of it. here is a scanned copy of the textbook page
i tried and failed on:
Q8, 9, 10, 12, 13

did the rest, so yeah, help would be much appreciated.
q9)We have







(2 m to the left of x means that the displacement is -2 (as it is to the left))

So,













ie















ie







When ,



 
Last edited:

Makro

Porcupine
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
415
Location
In between.
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Everything is clear as day, except for this bit, I thought when you integrate an exponential you use the rule: 1/a e^(ax+b)? Why is integrating e^t just e^t? Thank you for everything else :)
 

tommykins

i am number -e^i*pi
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
5,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Everything is clear as day, except for this bit, I thought when you integrate an exponential you use the rule: 1/a e^(ax+b)? Why is integrating e^t just e^t? Thank you for everything else :)
differentiating e^t gives e^t
 

sidereal

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2008
Messages
38
Location
Canberra
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Uni Grad
2013
Everything is clear as day, except for this bit, I thought when you integrate an exponential you use the rule: 1/a e^(ax+b)? Why is integrating e^t just e^t? Thank you for everything else :)
it's because in these motion problems we are integrating with respect to t rather than with respect to x

you're right,

but here we are doing and so we treat the t exactly the same way we treated the x in the original rule - i.e.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top