HotShot
-_-
he said tendulkar, lara etc know more about cricket. and naturall y they would its their job.otay said:I don't get why people say things like this. They probably know more about this specific topic (as they should) but just because they are a better cricketer than me or whoever doesn't mean they know more about CRICKET (in general) than me or any other cricket buff. Not saying I do know more, but how can you (or any1) claim things like this.
that argument is flawed its a what if situation, we only argue with what we have. so we know that murali average is lower, and he is younger than warne. Chances are he will be the leading wicket taker, at this rate anyway.Hmmm I think number of wickets and average have equal weighting. It's abot longevity. Lets for arguments sake take out all the wickets both have gotten against those 2 nations (Zim and Bangla). Murali is still 148 wickets behind warne. if by the end of both of their careers, murali has taken more wickets AND his average is still better, then you're argument will be strengethened. But who's to say murali may get another 148 wickets but at 42 runs each, making his average after 668 wickets greater than warnes (remember Murali's average without zim and bangla makes there averages much closer) . i mean he may get an injury, batsmen may figure out the doosra, a new spinner may come in and take of the wickets away from him. He's still 148 wickets away. If it were all averages then Bobby Peel or Jim Laker (a legit choice) would be considered best spinners of all time and Graeme Smith would be considered a better bat than Greenidge.
the gatting ball was just a surprise - arney was crap when he was selected and so it was surprise 0 nothin more. watch murali bowl out martyn. u named one incident 0-98, here are some others , 4 for 27 , 3 for 40 against Australia in Australia. he has taken 416 odi wickets @ 23.28 which pretty damn gud for a spinner.
At leat murali doesnt take drugs.