starbaaa
Untalkative Member
I was just wondering what other schools do in the way of assessments for music (whats in exams etc). I'm primarily interested in music 1, because thats what I do.
I just recently did my half-yearly exam, which was actually three exams. The first one was a musicology paper, which consisted of three sections. Section 1 had some excerpts of scores, and asked ridiculously easy questions on them (eg. what does tr mean? What bar does it appear in?). Section 2 was an essay which basically asked us to write down everything we knew about either jazz or popular music. Section 3 was composition. We had to do two compositions. The first one gave us a 12-bar blues song and asked us to write parts for two more pitched instruments. The second one gave us 2 bars of a pop song (for vocals, lead guitar, rhythm guitar, bass guitar and drums) and asked us to write another 6 bars. And that was the 2 hour musicology/composition paper.
We also had an aural exam, which was just the 2002 HSC music 1 aural paper. Pretty typical I suppose.
And we had a performance exam. For this we were required to perform 2 pieces. The first one was a set piece, which we had to perform individually with two teachers (not music teachers. they just play music) accompanying us. We had never played with these people before the exam. We walked into the exam room, got one practice run, then we did it again and were assessed. I thought that was slightly ridiculous. The second piece was free choice.
My music teachers are clueless. I'm not very impressed with their teaching methods, and I was just wondering if I should be unimpressed with their assessment methods. So how does this exam sound in relation to everyone elses? What do other schools set as music 1 assessments?
I just recently did my half-yearly exam, which was actually three exams. The first one was a musicology paper, which consisted of three sections. Section 1 had some excerpts of scores, and asked ridiculously easy questions on them (eg. what does tr mean? What bar does it appear in?). Section 2 was an essay which basically asked us to write down everything we knew about either jazz or popular music. Section 3 was composition. We had to do two compositions. The first one gave us a 12-bar blues song and asked us to write parts for two more pitched instruments. The second one gave us 2 bars of a pop song (for vocals, lead guitar, rhythm guitar, bass guitar and drums) and asked us to write another 6 bars. And that was the 2 hour musicology/composition paper.
We also had an aural exam, which was just the 2002 HSC music 1 aural paper. Pretty typical I suppose.
And we had a performance exam. For this we were required to perform 2 pieces. The first one was a set piece, which we had to perform individually with two teachers (not music teachers. they just play music) accompanying us. We had never played with these people before the exam. We walked into the exam room, got one practice run, then we did it again and were assessed. I thought that was slightly ridiculous. The second piece was free choice.
My music teachers are clueless. I'm not very impressed with their teaching methods, and I was just wondering if I should be unimpressed with their assessment methods. So how does this exam sound in relation to everyone elses? What do other schools set as music 1 assessments?