stupid_girl
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2009
- Messages
- 221
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
Hopefully I can introduce you another approach which is pure substitution and differential integration that I’m developing. However i need to prepare for trials atm!
Use the fact that for with equality holding for all x iff f(x) = 0.I’m quite stuck with this question, been doing for week. Pretty appreciate your help
I see I’ll check. Cuz i later figured out it’s Rolle theorem. Thank you, I’ll check them outUse the fact that for with equality holding for all x iff f(x) = 0.
I see, yeah i just realized. Thank you, I’ll fix itNote that so some of your working is incorrect.
Looking forward to your approach.Hopefully I can introduce you another approach which is pure substitution and differential integration that I’m developing. However i need to prepare for trials atm!
i like how this is just a reskin of the BOS Trials' cancerous arctangent integral
To get this thread going again I thought I'd give one of these a go.
what was your thought process behind that u-sub?To get this thread going again I thought I'd give one of these a go.
Letting :
We can eliminate any odd function terms in the expansion of the numerator (note that the denominator is even) as we are integrating over , so they go to 0. We end up with:
Both integrals are pretty straight forward to evaluate now, yielding a final answer of .