Which it really isnt. Its quite difficult in that, unlike in modern, you have to grasp difference social structures and practises that are SO removed from our own.Aerath said:There's nothing wrong with doing both. I think that both subjects are fantastic (despite Ancient having a rep of being a bludgy subject).
Wow. That's sounds so intense, saying 5-unit history.sonyaleeisapixi said:5 unit history
I'd say that's synonymous with virtually all subjects.honeyissweet25 said:history is a subject u have to give 100% to get 100%.
Hahaha. I know right?bored of sc said:Wow. That's sounds so intense, saying 5-unit history.
To the original thread poster, Sonya is evidence of how rewarding both histories (and extension) can be (in terms of performance and interest in the subject).
So give it a go. You can always drop, change.
By the way, you should definitely like history and/or perform well in the subject.
And, finally, all subjects have alot of content. Welcome the world of the HSC. Choosing a subject because it is considered to have less content is a silly thing to do.
yea but all subjects are boring in year 11Bboy-twoFousand said:it really depends on you because i took Modern history and dropped out cause i was falling asleep in class... I prefer Ancient... more interesting
Yay I'm one of them.sonyaleeisapixi said:T
Need moar 5 unit history year 12ers
who cares, its funMatt1120 said:Yay I'm one of them.
Umm if you love everything about history then do both. They're both really good courses. I like modern more than ancient coz its not all just dates and ancient historians. Be prepared to never stop studying history because there is alot of content in both the courses.