Boo_
Member
i go away for a few hrs, and therez 3 pages on stuff 2 read...oh well, GO MANLY!!! the only teams to have beaten manly seem to be dragons and broncos...and broncos beat dragons so thats acceptable
Haha. Mate, seriously, what's your agenda?Red Cordial said:It is not his Scotty's fault that he can't make origin. His dad holds him back, keeping him in the Broncos side.
What is your source for that? Last I heard, Dragons and Storm were appealing their fines, but the other three clubs (Dogs, Roosters, and Panthers) weren't.Suney_J said:Dont believe everything you read. Its just the NRL punishing them twice
so, winning games while over the salary cap is not the way to play a game...and knights had a legit reason to not be winning any games, no johnsangelduck said:today on the news it said somethin bout doggies appealing bcasue they only broke it coz of all the guyz on injury and havin to get more playerz or sumthin - dont know how well that will go down though, i mean, the knights have nmore than a team on the bench and they didnt go over, then again, their not winnin anythin
wow!! did u figure all this out yourself?? impressive! and also u saved ur bacon by changing the rorters to roosters, although i understand that u did leave 'rorters' there for a purpose otherwise u just would have pressed that little 'backspace' button on your keyboard.Boo_ said:another thing, i know how itz very xciting that dragons are in the top 8, but after the rorters/warriors...erh...roosters/warriors game, they will be pushed into 9th, regardless of the result.
dragons:
position = 8th
pts = 10
f/a = -2
roosters:
position = 9th
pts = 8
f/a = +9
warriors:
position = 10th
pts = 8
f/a = +8
who eva wins the roosters/warriors game, will have a +ve f/a and will be on 10pts, effectively pushing dragons into 9th...though they could have a draw, but with golden point ruling, it is highly unlikely
lol... not funny!!!!!Boo_ said:backspace button...waht is the back space thingy ur talking about, sunds like gibberish to me...
yeah, u mentioning it made me put it inDRAGONZ said:Hahaha, you know Mel, Boo_ and I were just talking about that on MSN.
Rorters... hmmm... it has a nice ring to it. But then again, it's a little slack.
What are we after, though? Being nice, or talking about the truth?
Oh, the difficulty in deciding what to choose!!
thxangelduck said:if i could b botherd with a green square id give it to u, woit the hey, well deserved effort boo!
bastard!!Boo_ said:yeah, u mentioning it made me put it in
Hey, you can't just blame him!**MeL**88 said:bastard!!
DRAGONZ said:Hey, you can't just blame him!
I was the one started mentioning "Rorters" to him on MSN. As any good Dragons supporter, I stick up for my fellow Dragons supporter and share some of the load that this criticsim carries with it.
Now for a lame chant:
Dragons FOREVER!
Roosters for NEVER!
Good enough.
i reckon we now have a decent motto for roostersDRAGONZ said:Hey, you can't just blame him!
I was the one started mentioning "Rorters" to him on MSN. As any good Dragons supporter, I stick up for my fellow Dragons supporter and share some of the load that this criticsim carries with it.
Now for a lame chant:
Dragons FOREVER!
Roosters for NEVER!
Good enough.
Ha. We all know that you love it. It does suck to admit the truth, doesn't it?**MeL**88 said:ahahahahhahaha that's all i have to say.... love the chant! not!
I'm sure we can get a better one. This will do for now, though.Boo_ said:i reckon we now have a decent motto for roosters