kokodamonkey
Active Member
i agree.jb_nc said:In general:
If a Union agrees with some process or action, it is therefore a bad action for the good of the public.
i agree.jb_nc said:In general:
If a Union agrees with some process or action, it is therefore a bad action for the good of the public.
There are so many instances when this is not the case it isn't funny...kokodamonkey said:i agree.
possibly, but i think the union has enough to do in defending all the guards (who been nominated for firing by the Boston report) - and will be a bit more lax on solving some of the middle-upper management problems. It'll work out as a compromise - firing a few managers instead of a few hundred guards (which should happen as well, but at least some progress will be made)banco55 said:I would have said the opposite. If they are going to lose anyway they might as well keep the union clowns on side so they'll continue donating to them when they are in opposition.
no i dont... there is the government and the oppositionNebuchanezzar said:You have the [near] words "gov" and "party" mixed up there, you dero.
That's because you've read too much propaganda from the Daily Telegraph.kokodamonkey said:i agree.
yeah well atleast our public transport arrives on time you communist spedNebuchanezzar said:I'm gonna move to the country, become a dero and start popping out babies.
well it's pretty hard to fuck up a linear routeNebuchanezzar said:musn't be hard to organise a system that gets from one end of town to the other.
lol oh i get it, you're jokingNebuchanezzar said:because he was, you dunce.
Communist likes Unions.ASNSWR127 said:There are so many instances when this is not the case it isn't funny...