@TheShy's answers are mostly correct, but have a few gaps... and there is a problem with several questions:
1(a) is a problem, see below.
1(b) gives an ester product, CH
3CH
2CH
2C(=O)OCH
2CH
2CH(CH
3)
2, named 2-methyl-1-propyl butanoate
2(a) is a problem. TheShy's answer is the one that the examiner is seeking, but it is problematic, firstly because butanamide will be a much much weaker base than 1-aminobutane, and secondly because amides can also act as acids. See below.
2(b) is a substitution reaction to make the amine 1-aminobutane, most likely as the salt butylammonium chloride, CH
3CH
2CH
2CH
2NH
3+Cl
-
2(c) is a substitution reaction or an elimination reaction, depending on conditions. Aqueous NaOH / KOH converts haloalkanes to alcohols. NaOH / KOH in alcohol instead promotes elimination to form alkenes.
CH
3CH
2Br + NaOH(aq) -----> CH
3CH
2OH + NaBr
CH
3CH
2Br + NaOH ---in ethanol---> CH
2CH
2 + H
2O + NaBr
3. TheShy is correct, potassium hydroxide will hydrolyse an ester. Note the difference in products from acid and base hydrolysis (which TheShy has handled correctly here):
2-methyl-1-butyl ethanoate + water ----acid catalysis----> 2-methyl-1-butanol + ethanoic acid
2-methyl-1-butyl ethanoate + KOH ----base catalysis----> 2-methyl-1-butanol + potassium ethanoate
4. Another problem question
-----
Ok, so what is the problem?
- Firstly, amides are distinctly different from amines. In amines, there is free rotation about the C-N bond (which is a single bond) and the N lone pair is available to be protonated (ie, it acts like a L-B base). Amides have neither of these properties. The C-N bond of an amide is much stronger than would be predicted from amines, it is shorter, and it does not allow free rotation. In fact, it has significant double bond character because it exists as a hybrid of the structure we draw... R-C(=O)-NHR' ... and a structure with two separated charges... R-C(-O-)=NHR'+. This means the N atom "lone pair" is actually involved in bonding and is unavailable to be used to form a coordinate covalent bond and act as a L-B base. In fact, the conjugate acid form of an amide has the extra H atom on the O and a c to N double bond, wit the + charge on the N.
- The page at https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Book:_Basic_Principles_of_Organic_Chemistry_(Roberts_and_Caserio)/24:_Organonitrogen_Compounds_II-_Amides_Nitriles__Nitro_Compounds/24.02:_Amides_as_Acids_and_Bases ilustrates the basicity of amides, which are generally treated as neutral compounds.
- The chemistry given for forming amides, by condensation of a carboxylic acid and ammonia or a suitable amine, is flawed. Putting a carboxylic acid with a weak base like ammonia or an amine will result in a L-B acid-bas equilibrium forming and almost no condensation. In reality, an amide is prepared by converting the carboxylic acid first to an acid chloride (RCOOH ---> RCOCl) using thionyl chloride (SOCl2), then reacting the acid chloride with ammonia or the amine. The direct reaction can be promoted by heating to well over 100 degC or adding a coupling reagent like DCC
- On this basis, the answer sought for 4 is propenoic acid plus ammonia, but it won't actually work.
- If 1(a) said butanoic acid plus ethanamine, then the same reaction would be intended with the product being N-ethylbutanamide.
- If 1(a) really means ethanamide, then I wonder if the question is suggesting a product like CH3CH2CH2C(=O)-NH-C(=O)CH3, but I am very doubtful that this would form. It's not a functional group that is in the syllabus, or that I am familiar with, and the reaction seems unlikely given the lack of basicity of ethanamide. My guess is there is a typo and the question intends ethanamine.