MaNiElla said:
Yeah, thats the attitude that all israelis have. 120 palestinians (if not more)were dead before the 8 israelis...which is proof that those israelis are nothing but blood thirsty savages.
Excellent proof MaNiElla.
Anyone remember that time the UN mandated a Jewish homeland peacefully (I believe it was 33 votes in favour, 13 against and 10 absent votes?) and then 8 Arab states launched a war against it? Like, if maybe the Arabs didn't try and totally annihilate Israel and failed there wouldn't be like...say, thousands of displaced refugees and just maybe there would have been a state of Palestine in the West Bank and Gaza. Maybe if 8 Arab nations didn't immediately declare war against the newly a peacefully formed state of Israel the West Bank and Gaza would still belong to Palestine and there'd be no war?
Now, I'm not an expert in international law but I'm pretty sure international law allows for the annexation of an aggressor's land after a conflict. Maybe if during the Rhodes Armistice talks and Luasanna conference in 1949 the Arabs accepted the annexed land from Israel in exchange for peace rather than using it as an excuse to further war there would be peace?
I think the 60ish year artificial war maintained by the Arabs in order to fuel their quest for the annihilation of Israel shows the Arabs to be slightly more bloody thirsty and savage. And chances are, if that all happened as above Israel and Palestine would not have lost the people in question and the middle east would be slightly more peaceful.
But that is just my little hypothetical theory on how the situation may have played out. Try using history as opposed to a trolls opinion to form your opinion of a situation, Maniella.