Parametric locus question (1 Viewer)

enigma_1

~~~~ Miss Cricket ~~~~
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
4,282
Location
Lords
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
isn't that just a simple factorisation?
No like you have to prove it somehow. You don't just show it, you have to prove something from part "a".. But I dunno what exactly to prove. :(
 

Squar3root

realest nigga
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
4,994
Location
phenchod
Gender
Male
HSC
1998
Uni Grad
2005
No like you have to prove it somehow. You don't just show it, you have to prove something from part "a".. But I dunno what exactly to prove. :(
well the normals at p is:
and at q is:
[simple derivations]

i was thinking solving them simataneoulsy or something, but that got me nowhere

EDIT: thats all i got lol, soz
 
Last edited:

enigma_1

~~~~ Miss Cricket ~~~~
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
4,282
Location
Lords
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
well the normals at p is:
and at q is:
[simple derivations]

i was thinking solving them simataneoulsy or something, but that got me nowhere

EDIT: thats all i got lol, soz
that's okay. Ok now I feel like an idiot, I think I'm overthinking it haha
 

enigma_1

~~~~ Miss Cricket ~~~~
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
4,282
Location
Lords
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
question.png

This is a bit better, how do you do part d?
 

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Let in the co-ordinates from c)

Now you'll get the co-ordinates in the form and where

So it lies on the parabola.
 

braintic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
2,137
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
How do you know t = p + q?
You don't know that t=p+q. She (he?) is saying that the answer you will get after doing the algebra is [2a(p+q), a(p+q)^2].
Its then up to you to recognise that this is in the standard parametric form for a parabola: , where (in this case) .
 
Last edited:

joelferns27

New Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
14
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
i had trouble with the exact same question, you must know that part b is independent of part a ! ahaha thats what got me too
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top