Partial Fractions Q8 (1 Viewer)

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
x^3+2=(Ax+B)x+C(x^2+1)
sub x=-1, 0, 1 to get:
1=A-B+2C
2=C
3=A+B+2C

-3=A-B
-1=A+B
A=-2, B=1
Integral of (-2x+1)/(x^2+1) + 2/x = - 2x/(x^2+1) + 1/(1+x^2) + 2/x
= -ln(x^2+1)+2lnx+tan<sup>-1</sup>x + C
= ln[x^2/(x^2+1)] + tan<sup>-1</sup>x + C

I think. I haven't covered partial fractions or inverse trig, yet... or integrals of things like 1/x, for that matter.
 
Last edited:

want2beSMART

Artificial Happiness c[x
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
erm the answer is x+2lnx - ln (x^2 + 1) - tan-1 x + C
 

Euler

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2003
Messages
81
Degrees are the same.

do something before you use partial fractions.

long division is one way to go.
 

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
(x^3+2)/(x^3+x)=(x^3+x)/(x^3+x) + (2-x)/(x^3+x)
=1-(x-2)/(x^3+x)

(x-2) = (Ax+B)x + C(x^2+1)
Sub in x=-1,0,1:
-3=A-B+2C
-2=C
-1=A+B+2C

1=A-B
3=A+B
A=2, B=1, C=-2

So the integral of (x^3+2)/(x^3+x) is
Integral of [1-(2x+1)/(x^2+1)+2/x}]
= x - ln(x^2+1) - tan<sup>-1</sup>x + 2lnx + C

BTW: Why was my initial method incorrect? All of my substitutions were correct, as far as I can see.
 
Last edited:

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Like Euler suggested, the partial fractions technique only works on P(x)/Q(x) where deg P < deg Q

I think it has to do with the fundamental theorem of algebra and the fact that if two polynomials of degree n are equal for more than n values of x, then they are equal for all values of x... which can be used to prove that the partial fractions you've split the polynomial into are identically equal to what's on the other side. The polynomials on either side of the equation that you created in your first post weren't of the same degree hence the partial fractions technique can't be used. You'll have to look into a proof of the fundamental theorem yourself if you want to know exactly why this is the case.
 

lfc_reds2003

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2004
Messages
357
you can use long division in that one

cos the degree of numerator is equal to degree of denominator
 

want2beSMART

Artificial Happiness c[x
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
441
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
haha dw i know how to do long division

but dont know when to use it...

when the power in the numerator is greater than the power in the denominator?
 

lfc_reds2003

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2004
Messages
357
greater than or equal to n then u sud have either logs inverse trigs or must use partials....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top