patrick7421
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2012
Which episode goes well with Skrzynecki's poems?
http://community.boredofstudies.org/showthread.php?t=228945Thanks for those links Without Wings. The study guides I have yet to peruse look promising, but I will let the 2009ers judge instead (Never been a fan, but have to give them a chance right?)
I would like to contribute a piece written by a colleague (of a colleague) of mine: Kate Eliza O'Connor from St Scholastica's College (Schols).
Every word in the English language supposedly has an average of five different meanings, and the concept of “belonging” can be ambiguous. Belonging may relate to the notion of being an appendage: a sign of possession or a word denoting ownership. It could be a sense of place inspace – a feeling of belonging to the land, being enmeshed in an environment, a social class, a cultural context or a particular era. Belonging can mean the assignation of an identity, an act involving being pigeonholed, stereotyped, placed within a certain group as the result of societal assumptions. Belonging may also relate to the construction of a self through socialisation and the desire to belong. It can result in a sense of identification, a means of locating oneself within discourses and ideologies. Or it could lead to the downfall and deconstruction of individuality.
Essentially, as has been noted in external forums and discussions, belonging can be simplified (or 'reduced') to the basic premises of:
1) Ownership.
2) Cultural / Geographical connection (rooted in our personal histories).
3) 'Stereotypes' or categorisation of normative and deviant groups.
4) Subjectivity and self (at this point i would consider Freudian and Kristevan theories, particularly for the stronger students).
5) The tension between construction of identity and destabilisation of individuality.
I believe the ideas raised in the above example can be suitably expanded upon by interested students, particularly as a syllabus outcome is for them to develop "ways in which exploring the concept and significance of belonging may broaden and deepen their understanding of themselves and their world" (Prescriptions of the new HSC syllabus, page 10).
Thanks again for organising this new sub-forum Without Wings
image to considerAnalysis
Each separate timeline represents the study group's interactions based on the absence of one of its members. When Troy leaves to get the pizza, the worst possible scenario occurs, suggesting that without him in the group, chaos erupts. Jeff's timeline is the complete opposite of this. His controlling nature, in addition to his inability to completely open himself up to the group, means that the best possible scenario occurs in his absence. It can be inferred that Troy is a more passive and calming influence on the group than Jeff whose presence unknowingly stirs up conflict.
Ideology/Hegemony/Power
Community
Many of the most popular television series are comedies. Using comedy to make fun of conventional hegemonies can actually result in undermining stereotypical views and ultimately disproving existing hegemony. However comedy can also as an easy excuse for saying or doing something that can be offence or isn’t widely accepted as appropriate. It is often difficult to differentiate between when comedy has gone too far. It is also hard to distinguish when comedy can be used as a justification of why hegemony is being reinforced in certain situations. With the use of my artefact I will try to figure out if it is suitable to reinforce hegemony with the use of comedy in order to make a point of how exaggerated or ridiculous this hegemony is in comparison to real life.
The artefact that I will be using in order to support this idea is the television show Community. The premise of the show is about a group of very diverse individuals at different stages of their lives that happen to be attending a local community college called Greendale together. The main components that I will use to probe deeper into the issue are the characters and the setting.
In order to properly analyse if hegemony is actually being reinforced it is important to have a basic understanding of the main group of seven friends. They are Jeff Winger, Britta Perry, Abed Nadir, Troy Barnes, Shirley Bennett, Annie Edison and Pierce Hawthorne. Another reoccurring significant character is the group’s Spanish teacher Ben Chang (Senor Change). All the main characters have very specific almost one-note stereotypes of personalities according to their skin colour, occupation, or age (Barker). For the purposes of this paper we will take a closer look at three of the seven characters.
First, Shirley Bennett who is a divorced black Christian woman coming back to community college in order to take business classes to start her own baked goods business. The main appeal that the show uses as comedic relief is her religious beliefs and how that influences the way she lives her life. All the members in the group have mixed religious beliefs. Some of the hegemonies that are reinforced throughout the series are that Christian people are ignorant to other religions and Christian people always try to impose their beliefs on others. In this particular case I think that humour is used in a way to enhance these hegemonies.
Second, Pierce Hawthorne who is the elder Caucasian man that comes to Greendale to “keep his mind active”. The main hegemony that is reinforced is that old people are ignorant to changes in our world. The ongoing joke is the fact that Pierce is so ignorant to the changing world, yet he seems to want to do what that other younger people in the group want to do. We see Pierce make racially discriminating comments towards the black people in the group and we see him try sexually harass the women in the group. Many times we see pierce try out new gadgets and take about new idea in an attempt to understand what the younger crowd is talking about, but his attempts mostly result in offending someone. In this case I feel like that the comedy is just so exaggerated that it actually makes the audience realize that the things Pierce says and does is just ridiculously unrealistic that it actually ends up undermining the hegemony.
The show cleverly uses comedy in order to not reinforce hegemony was by stating the stereotypical behaviour blatantly and obviously. An example of this is Senor Chang who is an Asian man teaching Spanish at the Community College. In Senor Chang’s character often the ideology of racism to try to reinforce hegemony is used. One instance of this is when Senor Chang is introduced as the Spanish Teacher. Senor Chang himself says that it will be assumed that he would be teaching martial arts or some other “ancient” or “mystical” subject. The audience is able to see how their “normal” assumption of a Chinese teacher isn’t always true. Here we can see hegemony is almost oppositional in terms of the race of a person not determining what their interests are (Sellnow). That there was something in fact that was strange about a Chinese man teaching Spanish.
However by stating to the audience to put aside these assumptions hegemony is not reinforced.
One of the main strengths of this show is the fact that it’s comedy is witty and smart, and this results from the fact that the audience plays a crucial part in understand how obviously ridiculous the characteristics of the main people in the show are. Therefore by amplifying these characteristics (even though they reinforce hegemony) the show actually manages to portray through their smart comedy that the hegemony they are reinforcing is actually factual.
Another thing that is crucial in the success of the series is the setting. The events of the show take place in a community college and throughout the sitcom the dean is constantly trying to make his community college seem like it’s a prestigious place. The show ideology about community college is a place for odd misfits who don’t care much for their academics. This is mostly portrayed by the Dean of the college who is trying to make his college seems like a great place to study. However his attempts to make the school seem like a respectable place to get an education almost always ends in comedic failure. In this area of the series I feel that hegemony is actually reinforced because by the end of the episode always ends up with the community college being portrayed in a negative way. From this
When we take a step back look at this show and see exactly what it is ultimately trying to persuade our culture to think or do I think is to say that people do get along, and that even the people who are least likely to seek out to friends with each other can actually build really great relationships. This proposition may seem a little far*fetched when you see all the hegemonies I have presented to you. However, I think that that that whole point of a show like this; to take a realistic setting and characters (whose personalities have been amplified and exaggerated for the purposes of the show being a comedy), and actually make them a part of popular culture with all the hegemonies that surround them and still ultimately be able to say that they are friends at the end of the day. This is relevant to our culture because
So, does comedy in fact reinforce hegemony by undermining the seriousness of the issue or does it portray situations that are so ridiculously unreal that it cannot possibly be true for all people in society. It’s still difficult to tell where the line should be drawn in terms of what is appealing in a comedic way and what’s offensive. Just in this show we can clearly that comedy works in both ways. The question however is not to see how effective the show is in being comedic but if the comedy in the show influences people perception of people and places according to one set standard that the show upholds. In this case the main idea of the show is to portray “misfits” who are attending community college because they were unable to get earlier choices in life. The real task here is not for the producers, writers, and directors to figure out if comedy actually reinforced hegemony because their main goal to get as many people as they can watch the show. However we as viewers must be aware that the point of the show is not to give us a show is which we tune out our minds and just enjoy cheap jokes, but to in fact relish in the creativity and smarts that is takes to play with hegemonies that are in our society but still make viewers by the end of it know that this show is most definitely not based on real life standards and that they aren’t trying to make you believe or buy into hegemonies that may be prevalent in pop culture.
In conclusion we can see that there are indeed hegemonies represented in the show Community with the use of characters and setting. However, it is difficult even after analysing to decide whether comedy is actually reinforced hegemony or not. I feel like ultimately it’s up to the audience to decide for themselves whether they can look past the exaggerated hegemonies which are only for comedic purposes.
References
Barker, Cory. “2009-10 season wrap: Community.” Tv Surveillance. Word Press, 24/06/2010. Web. 3 Mar 2011. http://tvsurveillance.com/2010/06/04/2009-10-season-wrap-community/.
Sellnow, Deanna D. The Rhetorical Power of Popular Culture Consiering Mediated Texts. United States of America: Sage, 2010. 74.
“Community Trailer.” Youtube. Web. 3 Mar 2011. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBCE9oIuN24>.