Ok, for the second part, I think i did ok to explore change and stuff, but i like kinda forgot the fact that the story was for submission to a competition entitled "pictures of change"
I used the image and the fact that it was on a mobile phone towards the end, howevor i failed to use "pictures" as either a recuring theme or a central idea to my story.
I would have done if I was in that frame of mind, but i kinda got stuck into it and subsequently neglected the importance of the title.
What I am asking essentially, is how much they would mark it down based on the fact that i didn't really get a chance to go with this "pictures" thing. My guess is that it would come under the "appropriate to audience, purpose and context" section of the rubric / syllabus.
Any ideas?
I used the image and the fact that it was on a mobile phone towards the end, howevor i failed to use "pictures" as either a recuring theme or a central idea to my story.
I would have done if I was in that frame of mind, but i kinda got stuck into it and subsequently neglected the importance of the title.
What I am asking essentially, is how much they would mark it down based on the fact that i didn't really get a chance to go with this "pictures" thing. My guess is that it would come under the "appropriate to audience, purpose and context" section of the rubric / syllabus.
Any ideas?