That's why I prefer to know about the technical aspects, and only reveal them (discuss them) when the opportunity presents itself. I like to think about the other person and what they may (or may not) know. It's better to have a simplified view of things, and progress onto the more advanced or technical, when necessary.
You wouldn't like to bombard somebody with words and terms they may never not have heard of (I think that makes sense). The technical aspects are good, but it's only necessary to go into such technicalities when you're on an even playing field.
I understand what you're saying, about confusing the 'un-confused' (who were, once, confused themselves).