... I called the HSC advice line and spoke for a while about extended response questions. About the case study- under this year's syllabus, it "should" be studied, next year- it "must". Two years in a row... I don't know if they'll ask it this year or not. Even if they do, there'll still be that internal choice within the internal choice- if not the effects of globalisation, consequences on environment etc. in another economy, then australia- which they told me is basically everything in topic2. I'm pretty sure I'm not going to go over my Poland case study too much... I'm much more confident with answering a question about the specific Aust. eco within the context of...
For extended response- topic2, 3 and 4= though things like balance of payments in topic2 cross- over with external stability in topic3, likewise with free trade and protection with trade policy in topic4.
- Internal Stability- Ecogrowth, unemployment, inflation
- External Stability
- Microeco Policy, with labour market specific- i think they asked just about labour market in 2003, in the non- stimulus question, and most people answered the case study globalisation question. Other than that there was microeco policy in relation to structural change in 2002.
- Macroeco Policy, with fiscal+monetary specific
- Trade Stuff= policy, free trade agreements, protection, international imbalances developing economy/EU agricultural protection etc.
- Ecologically sustainable development (never ever asked before)
- Income and Wealth Distribution (never ever asked before)
--- for the last two issues in topic3, they told me on the advice line that they tend not to ask about them specifically in extended response stimulus (q25, 26) like they would for inflation and unemployment, because apparently teachers are less inept to teach it.
nosadness--- FTAs with US, Singapore, Thailand, and NZ currently, negotiating with ASEAN, China, UAE (or saudi arabia) and Malaysia (or already?)