MrBrightside
Brightest Member
- Joined
 - Jan 18, 2010
 
- Messages
 - 2,032
 
- Gender
 - Undisclosed
 
- HSC
 - N/A
 
Hi there, I'm not sure if this question is WITH replacement or WITHOUT  replacement. I tried it both ways and didn't come to the correct answer.  I'm assuming this question makes more sense WITHOUT replacement.
Question:
http://i.imgur.com/nfBSA.png
I did the following working out:
{Faulty = 3 / 100 Not Faulty = 97/100} - first branch
{(Faulty = 2 / 99 and Not Faulty = 97/99) comes off the Faulty branch, (Faulty = 3 / 99, Not Faulty = 96 / 99) comes off the not faulty branch} - Second branch
{(Faulty = 1 / 98 and Not Faulty = 97/98) comes off the first Faulty branch and second faulty branch...Etc Think you'll understand what I mean} - Third branch
 
I did P(1 is faulty) = (3/100*97/98*96/98) + (97/100*3/99*96/98) + (97/100*96/99*3/98) = 1164 / 13475
 
Correct answer: 84 681 / 1 000 000
Thanks
	
		
			
		
		
	
								Question:
http://i.imgur.com/nfBSA.png
I did the following working out:
{Faulty = 3 / 100 Not Faulty = 97/100} - first branch
{(Faulty = 2 / 99 and Not Faulty = 97/99) comes off the Faulty branch, (Faulty = 3 / 99, Not Faulty = 96 / 99) comes off the not faulty branch} - Second branch
{(Faulty = 1 / 98 and Not Faulty = 97/98) comes off the first Faulty branch and second faulty branch...Etc Think you'll understand what I mean} - Third branch
I did P(1 is faulty) = (3/100*97/98*96/98) + (97/100*3/99*96/98) + (97/100*96/99*3/98) = 1164 / 13475
Correct answer: 84 681 / 1 000 000
Thanks
				