I've been given conflicting information from my two textbooks as to whether property is included in the calculation of the Consumer Price Index, and headline inflation. Tim Dixon's book, "Australia in the Global Economy", said this:
"...the CPI does not include property prices, so that the large increase in residential property prices since the late 1990s has not been reflected directly in the CPI"
and Tim Riley's book, "Economics 2009", said this:
"The method of calculation of the CPI by the ABS changed in 1998. The ABS now uses an 'acquisition' based approach in measuring prices...this means...the purchase price of new houses (excluding land) is included"
So, whats the consensus? Is property included, or not? Is this a simple misunderstanding by me, that will make me feel stupid as soon as it is explained? I have a feeling it is...
Thanks in advance.
"...the CPI does not include property prices, so that the large increase in residential property prices since the late 1990s has not been reflected directly in the CPI"
and Tim Riley's book, "Economics 2009", said this:
"The method of calculation of the CPI by the ABS changed in 1998. The ABS now uses an 'acquisition' based approach in measuring prices...this means...the purchase price of new houses (excluding land) is included"
So, whats the consensus? Is property included, or not? Is this a simple misunderstanding by me, that will make me feel stupid as soon as it is explained? I have a feeling it is...
Thanks in advance.