i sub tat e first...then the x=2....then going back to x=1~~ since it says x>0Managore said:I just stated x=e was maximum, and in the equation was true, and that x=2 and x=3 also gave true answers, thus x^e>_e^x (or whatever)
ya answer is perhaps d most correct~~ dam i stuffed it!!acmilan1987 said:the max value given when x = e is f(x) = 1/e
so that means f(x) <= 1/e
(ln x)/x <= 1/e
elnx <= x
ln (x^e) <= x
x^e <= e^x
hence e^x >= x^e
acmilan1987 said:the max value given when x = e is f(x) = 1/e
so that means f(x) <= 1/e
(ln x)/x <= 1/e
elnx <= x
ln (x^e) <= x
x^e <= e^x
hence e^x >= x^e
I cant see them taking a mark away if you get the right answer no matter how long the method (unless you contradict yourself somewhere)speersy said:ohh hell yeah thats what i did, after much working out than finally stumbling on the answer.
I was just reading this thing that said
"Practise writing neatly and fluently. it is not too late to improve the way your work reads. (Remember that marks may be deducted for careless or badly arranged work.) The examiners mark quickly, and it is to your advantage to communicate well"
Is this true, even though the question is eventually correct, they may subtract marks?
Its basically the same thing~ ReNcH ~ said:For that question, I kind of fudged it:
I said:
Since 1/e is a local max:
1/e <= lnx/x
.'. 1 <= elnx/x
.'. x <= elnx
.'. x <= ln(x<sup>e</sup>)
.'. e<sup>x</sup> >= x<sup>e</sup> for x>0
acmilan....is this right, coz I pretty much fudged it??